How to Choose NPS Software
Turn this article into takeaways for your work.
Each assistant summarizes the article only for you and suggests best practices for your work.
Updated September 2026.
Retently and Survicate fit a company that wants triggered, post-purchase NPS with its own team wiring the follow-up shut. AskNicely fits a multi-location or frontline business that needs a branch manager alerted within minutes of a bad score, not a monthly slide. Nicereply, Simplesat, and Customer Thermometer fit a support or CS team measuring NPS the moment a ticket or project closes, tied to the help desk they already run. Qualtrics, Medallia, and InMoment fit an enterprise that wants NPS folded into a full customer experience programme with journey analytics and text mining. CustomerGauge fits a B2B company that wants NPS tied to account health and renewal risk, not a standalone score nobody owns. And if Delighted is on your shortlist, take it off: it shut down for customers on 30 June 2026, and its own new owner sends every visitor straight to Qualtrics. The question underneath all of it is simple. After someone answers your survey, does a named person see it, and does anything happen before the next survey goes out?
NPS software sits next to a few categories it gets confused with. Survey software is the general-purpose tool NPS often runs on top of, with more question types and no opinion about what a 0-to-10 score should trigger. Customer onboarding software and help desk software are two of the moments a transactional NPS survey actually fires from. A customer data platform is where the score should land once collected, next to the rest of the account record instead of living alone in a feedback tool. And product analytics software is the category NPS gets bolted onto inside the product itself.
Before any of that, split the buying decision in two. Relational NPS is a periodic health check on the whole relationship: one survey a quarter or two a year, sent to your customer base, used for a trend line and a board slide. Transactional NPS triggers off a specific interaction, right after a support ticket closes, an order ships, or an onboarding milestone hits, to catch and fix a bad moment while it's still fixable. Most companies eventually need both, and most tools here are visibly better built for one than the other.
| Relational NPS | Transactional NPS | |
|---|---|---|
| When it fires | Fixed calendar cadence: quarterly, biannual, or annual | Right after a specific event: ticket closed, order shipped, milestone reached |
| Who receives it | The whole customer base, or a representative sample | The person who just had that interaction |
| What it measures | Overall relationship health | That one moment |
| Primary use | Trend line, benchmarking, executive reporting | Catching and fixing a bad experience before it compounds |
| Tools built for it | Qualtrics, Medallia, InMoment, CustomerGauge, Retently | AskNicely, Nicereply, Simplesat, Customer Thermometer, Survicate |
Collecting a score is not running a programme
Almost any survey tool can ask "how likely are you to recommend us." That's the easy half of NPS, and the half every vendor demo leads with. The hard half never shows up in a demo: sampling the right customer at the right moment, getting a response rate worth acting on, and making sure a detractor's answer reaches a specific person before the relationship gets worse. Most buyers over-invest in the asking and under-invest in the closing, and it shows up first in the response rate.
Retently's analysis of more than 25 million survey invitations sent by ecommerce brands in 2025 found NPS email invitations converting at 4.5% overall, falling to 3.07% by the fourth quarter, well below the 9.76% Retently measured for CSAT and 22.54% for CES over the same period (Retently, 2025 survey response rate study). A plain email-only NPS programme is starting from a thin base, so the channel mix a vendor supports matters as much as its dashboard.
| Channel | Typical response rate | Vendors built around it |
|---|---|---|
| Email invitation | Lowest of the common channels | Every tool supports this; treat it as the floor |
| In-app widget | Meaningfully higher, captured at the moment of use | Refiner, Pendo, Survicate, Qualtrics intercepts |
| Embedded in a transactional email or receipt | Rides an email the customer already opens | Retently, Customer Thermometer, Nicereply |
| SMS or link after a support interaction | Fast and short, tied to one ticket or visit | AskNicely, Nicereply, Simplesat |
| Standalone website or link | Usually the weakest of the group | General survey tools with no native trigger |
Key Facts: choosing NPS software
- The lifetime value gap between detractors and promoters typically runs 3X to 8X, which is the entire economic case for treating NPS as a programme rather than a report (Bain & Company, Net Promoter System).
- Closing the loop with a customer within 48 hours increases retention by 12% and lifts the following NPS reading by an average of 6 points (CustomerGauge, April 2026).
- At least two-thirds of the Fortune 1000 track Net Promoter Score as a core metric, which is also why so many of them just inherited a forced vendor migration when Delighted shut down (Fortune, 2020).
What to look for
These five decide whether you bought a programme or a survey with a nicer name.
| Criterion | Why it matters | What good looks like |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling and trigger control | Survey the wrong customer at the wrong moment and the score means nothing | Rules fire off a real event, not a blanket monthly blast |
| A response rate you can act on | A thin, email-only sample is too noisy to trust as a trend | A channel mix, in-app or embedded alongside email |
| Closed-loop routing to a named person | A score nobody sees is a number, not a signal | An alert reaching an owner within the working day, with an SLA |
| Tie-back to the account or CRM record | A tool that lives alone can't show whether promoters renew | The score writes to the deal or account record automatically |
| Historical comparability | Switching methodology quietly breaks the trend line | A fixed scale and sample rule you can run unchanged for years |
These five decide whether the programme survives past the first quarter.
| Criterion | Why it matters | What good looks like |
|---|---|---|
| Comment and text analytics | Most of the signal sits in the open-text comment, not the number | Theme or sentiment tagging without a dedicated analyst |
| Benchmarking | A raw score means little in isolation | Your own trend plus an industry or peer comparison |
| Segmentation | An aggregate score hides which segment is unhappy | Filter by plan, region, or tier without exporting |
| Enough seats for the people who need it | One dashboard login doesn't change frontline behaviour | Pricing that doesn't force you to ration logins |
| Closed-loop routing's place on the price ladder | Several vendors gate the exact feature that matters | Alerting and routing on the entry paid tier, not Enterprise |
For the fuller scoring sheet that applies across any SaaS purchase, see our SaaS vendor evaluation scorecard. And if half of what you're really solving for is where customer feedback lives alongside the rest of the account, read our guide to choosing a customer data platform before you sign anything.
Key questions to ask before you buy
Where does the score actually go once collected? Ask for a live demo of it landing in the CRM or account record automatically, not a CSV export someone reconciles by hand.
Who gets notified when a detractor responds, and how fast? Push for an answer in hours, not "immediately." Several vendors route alerts through a weekly digest by default, which defeats the point.
Is pricing metered by seats, by responses, or by credits? Response-based pricing is a trap worth naming: several vendors bill by responses collected, so the price rises exactly when the programme starts working.
Can the same tool run a relational pulse and a transactional trigger, or only one? A tool built for one mode will fight you if you try to force the other into it.
What happens to your historical score if you switch vendors? A changed sample size, scale, or survey wording breaks the trend line even if the new tool is objectively better.
Is closed-loop routing included on the plan you can actually afford? Price the tier that contains the alerting and routing, not the tier on the homepage.
Is comment analysis included, or will someone read every response by hand? Fine at 50 responses a month, unworkable at 5,000.
If you're a relationship-driven B2B company running one survey a year, does this tool still make sense? A high-frequency tool built for retail visits or support tickets is a poor fit for an annual check-in, and the reverse is just as true.
Shortlist
Not a ranking. Three groups, because the right fit here depends more on your motion than on any single feature. Prices follow in the pricing section, verified against each vendor's own page in September 2026.
Purpose-built NPS and CX feedback specialists:
| Tool | Best for | Sampling style | Closed-loop routing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Retently | Ecommerce and SaaS teams running relational plus post-purchase NPS | Automated cadence, or triggered by an order or milestone | Native ticketing and CRM tagging on paid plans |
| Survicate | Multi-channel programmes across website, in-app, and email | Website widget, in-app, link, or email | Slack and CRM integrations, response-metered |
| AskNicely | Multi-location or frontline businesses needing a manager alerted per visit | Triggered per transaction or visit | Real-time alert direct to the local manager |
| Nicereply | Support teams measuring CSAT, CES, and NPS at ticket close | Triggered by ticket or interaction close | Native help desk integration |
| Simplesat | CS and agency teams running post-ticket or post-project feedback | Triggered by ticket or project close | Native helpdesk and PSA integrations |
| Customer Thermometer | A one-click rating embedded in an email or receipt footer | Any triggered email, unused responses roll over | Rule-based alerts, unlimited seats on every plan |
| Zonka Feedback | One platform for survey collection plus AI analytics | Multi-channel, both relational and transactional | Quote-gated, priced on responses or data credits |
| Refiner | Product-led teams running in-app NPS and PMF surveys | In-app, triggered by usage or lifecycle stage | Slack, Segment, CRM integrations, unlimited responses |
Retently and Survicate are the two most flexible generalists here: both run a relational cadence and a transactional trigger from the same account, and both scale from a small team to mid-market without a platform migration. AskNicely suits a physical or service-visit business, since real-time alerts to a local manager are the whole product. Nicereply and Simplesat assume you already live inside a help desk and want NPS, CSAT, and CES measured the moment a ticket closes. Customer Thermometer and Refiner sit at opposite ends of the same idea: the simplest possible transactional ask versus an in-app survey metered by monthly active users.
Enterprise customer experience platforms:
| Tool | Best for | Pricing model | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qualtrics | Enterprises wanting NPS inside a full XM programme with journey analytics | Usage-metered, quote-only | The forward path Delighted's former parent points customers toward |
| Medallia | Enterprises running CX across many channels and business units | Priced on Experience Data Records, quote-only | Text and speech analytics native to the platform |
| InMoment | Enterprises wanting CX plus employee experience and text analytics together | Quote-only | No published pricing anywhere on the site |
| CustomerGauge | B2B companies tying account-level NPS to renewal risk | Annual, account-based | Own pricing page states plans start at $24,000 |
These four are a different purchase than the specialists above, closer to a CX platform that happens to include NPS. That's the right call once a score needs to sit next to journey mapping or account-level revenue risk, and the wrong call if a mid-market team just wants a working feedback loop without an implementation quarter. CustomerGauge is the one built specifically for B2B: it ties every response to the account record and flags renewal risk from the score itself.
Bolted onto an adjacent category:
| Tool | Category it lives in | NPS depth | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| SurveyMonkey (GetFeedback) | General survey platform | An NPS template inside a broader survey builder | GetFeedback is active; its "GetFeedback Direct" add-on sunsets 31 December 2026 |
| Pendo | Product analytics | A "Sentiment" module offering NPS, PMF, and CSAT surveys | Pendo-branded NPS free up to 500 MAU; paid tiers are quote-only |
A help desk you already pay for is worth checking before any of the above. Zendesk, Intercom, and Freshdesk all ship CSAT surveys natively, and some plans extend that to NPS, which is a fourth tool you can avoid buying if the feature already sits in a platform you own. Our help desk software guide and live chat software guide cover what's native to each.
Vendor continuity: what buyers still assume, and what's actually true. This category has had an unusually rough eighteen months, and the assumptions most buyers carry in are already out of date.
| Product | What buyers still assume | What's actually true as of September 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Delighted | The simple, affordable default NPS starter tool | Shut down for customers on 30 June 2026; delighted.com now redirects straight to Qualtrics |
| Hotjar | An independent, affordably priced feedback and heatmap tool | Merged into Contentsquare; no longer sold or priced as a standalone product (Contentsquare) |
| GetFeedback Direct | An SMS or offline feedback add-on inside GetFeedback | Being sunset 31 December 2026, per SurveyMonkey's own GetFeedback page; the core GetFeedback product is unaffected |
| Qualtrics | The expensive, hard-to-justify enterprise option | The default landing spot for every displaced Delighted customer, whether they asked for it or not |
None of this means avoid small or recently acquired vendors; several of the best fits above are exactly that kind of company. It means confirm continuity as its own line item before you sign, the same way you'd confirm a security certification or an uptime SLA.
How to choose: a decision framework
Match your situation to a starting point, then run two finalists against real customer traffic for at least a full quarter. NPS needs more elapsed time to evaluate than most software, because what you're testing is a trend line, and a trend needs more than one data point.
| Your situation | Start here | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Ecommerce or SaaS wanting relational and post-purchase NPS | Retently or Survicate | Both run either mode from one account, no platform switch |
| Multi-location, franchise, or field-service business | AskNicely | Real-time alerts to the local manager are the core product |
| Support or CS team measuring feedback at ticket close | Nicereply or Simplesat | Built to trigger from a help desk event, not a calendar |
| Small team wanting the simplest transactional ask | Customer Thermometer | One-click ratings embedded anywhere you send email |
| Product-led team running in-app NPS or PMF surveys | Refiner or Pendo | Priced and built around monthly active users, not seats |
| Enterprise needing NPS inside a full CX programme | Qualtrics, Medallia, or InMoment | Journey analytics and text mining beyond a specialist |
| B2B company tying NPS to account health and renewal | CustomerGauge | Built to connect a score to revenue risk per account |
| Already running a help desk with built-in CSAT | Price and pilot that feature first | A fourth tool duplicating data you already collect |
| Was about to shortlist Delighted | Retently, Survicate, or Qualtrics, by scale | Delighted is gone; pick by your actual size, not habit |
Pricing: what to expect
Pricing here takes three shapes: per seat, metered by responses or survey volume collected, and priced by monthly active users, the same trap that shows up in product analytics. Read the unit next to every number before comparing it to anything else on your shortlist.
| Vendor | Entry price (verified) | Billing basis | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Customer Thermometer | Jumper, $49/month | As printed, unlimited seats | 200 responses/month, unused responses roll over |
| Retently | Ecommerce Basic, $99/month | As printed | 2,500 surveys/month, 10 campaigns, 3 seats |
| Nicereply | Starter, $79/month ($59/month billed annually) | Monthly or annual | 100 responses/month, 3 users |
| Simplesat | Standard, $119/month ($109/month billed annually) | Monthly or annual | 1,000 responses/month, 5 account users |
| Survicate | Growth, starts at $114/month | Billed annually | 250 survey responses/month |
| SurveyMonkey | Team Advantage, $25/user/month | Billed annually, 3-user minimum | GetFeedback's own tiers load dynamically, no static rate |
| Refiner | Priced on a monthly-active-user calculator | Annual saves about 17% | Unlimited survey responses on every tier |
| AskNicely | Quote-only, Learn / Grow / Transform | Scales with response volume, from 500 responses | No published dollar figures |
| Zonka Feedback | Quote-only | Metered by responses or data credits | Two products priced separately |
| CustomerGauge | "Built For Scale Starting at $24K" | Annual, account-based | Own words, verbatim from its pricing page |
| Pendo | Free up to 500 monthly active users | Paid tiers quote-only | NPS ships as a "Sentiment" feature, not a dedicated programme |
| Qualtrics | Quote-only | Usage-metered | No dollar figures published anywhere on the page |
| Medallia | Quote-only | Priced on Experience Data Records | No dollar figures published |
Two flags before you budget. First, several specialists meter by responses or active users rather than seats, so the bill rises exactly when the programme starts working. Model that growth before signing an annual contract. Second, "quote-only" and "no longer sold" aren't the same fact: AskNicely, Zonka, Qualtrics, and Medallia genuinely decline to publish a number; Delighted doesn't have one because there's no product left to buy.
Migration and lock-in
The switching cost here isn't the survey template. Every tool can recreate a 0-to-10 question in an afternoon. What doesn't move cleanly is the trend line: a score is only comparable to your last one if the sample, the trigger, and the scale stayed identical. Change any of those and you haven't improved your tracking, you've started a new metric wearing the old one's name.
Delighted's shutdown is the live example running through this category right now. Several vendors above published a "Delighted alternative" migration guide around the 30 June 2026 access cutoff, because thousands of relational trend lines got forcibly interrupted at once. The lesson isn't unique to Delighted: vendor continuity belongs on your evaluation checklist as its own row, not an afterthought after a shutdown notice arrives.
Before you sign anywhere, get a sample export and confirm it carries response-level data, meaning each score, comment, and timestamp, not just an aggregate monthly number. An aggregate-only export means your history effectively resets the day you migrate. And if NPS informs onboarding or renewal decisions, keep the score wired to wherever those decisions get made; our guide to choosing a customer data platform covers keeping a metric portable across the tools that consume it.
Frequently asked questions
What's the difference between transactional and relational NPS software?
Relational NPS surveys your customer base on a fixed calendar cadence to track overall relationship health as a trend line. Transactional NPS triggers off a specific event, a closed ticket, a completed order, an onboarding milestone, to catch and fix that individual moment. Some tools do both well; many are built for one and bend awkwardly toward the other, so confirm which mode you need before comparing feature lists.
Do we need dedicated NPS software, or can our help desk or CRM handle it?
Check first. Zendesk, Intercom, and Freshdesk all ship native CSAT surveys, and several plans extend to NPS, covering a support-triggered programme without a new contract. A dedicated tool earns its keep once you need multi-channel distribution, comment analytics, or closed-loop routing your existing platform doesn't offer.
What response rate should we expect from an NPS survey?
Plan around single digits if you're sending by email alone. Retently's 2025 analysis of over 25 million invitations put NPS-specific email response at 4.5% overall, falling toward 3% by the fourth quarter, well behind CSAT and CES sent through the same channel. In-app, embedded, and SMS-triggered surveys generally convert higher than a standalone email ask, worth weighing against a vendor's channel mix before you commit.
How fast should we follow up with a detractor?
Within the same working day, and ideally within 48 hours at the outside. CustomerGauge's research on closed-loop programmes found that responding within 48 hours lifts retention by 12% and raises the following NPS reading by an average of 6 points. A tool that routes detractor alerts through a weekly digest rather than a real-time notification is quietly working against the reason you bought it.
What happened to Delighted, and where should its former customers go?
Delighted stopped taking annual renewals from 1 July 2025, stopped renewing remaining monthly subscriptions after 31 May 2026, and ended customer access entirely on 30 June 2026. delighted.com now redirects to Qualtrics' Delighted page, which states plainly that Delighted "is no longer available." Former customers land on Qualtrics by default, but a team that liked Delighted for its simplicity is often a better match for a specialist like Retently or Survicate.
Is Hotjar still a standalone NPS or feedback option?
No, not as an independently sold product. Hotjar has merged into Contentsquare, and hotjar.com now redirects to a Contentsquare page describing the two platforms as combined. There's no separate Hotjar pricing page anymore, so treat any older comparison that lists it as independent with caution.
How is NPS software typically priced, and what's the catch?
Three models dominate: per seat, per response or survey volume collected, and per monthly active user. The catch sits in the second and third: your bill scales up exactly when the programme succeeds and more people respond, the opposite of how most software pricing behaves. Model realistic response growth before signing an annual contract on a metered plan.
Can one tool run both transactional and relational NPS at once?
Yes, but not every tool does it well. Retently and Survicate both support a scheduled relational cadence and an event-triggered send from the same account, covering most mid-market needs without two separate tools. Specialists built for one mode, AskNicely for frontline triggers or Qualtrics for enterprise relational programmes, will technically allow the other but fit it less naturally.
Buy the loop, not the score
The score is the cheap part. Any survey tool can ask the question and hand you a number between negative 100 and 100. What separates an NPS purchase that changes outcomes from one that produces a monthly slide nobody reads is whether the tool samples the right customer, gets a response rate worth acting on, and puts a detractor's answer in front of a specific person before the account is at real risk. Decide first whether you're running a relational health check, a transactional catch-and-fix loop, or both, then buy against that. And if a familiar name from an old listicle turns up on your shortlist, check whether it's still a company before you check whether it's still a fit.
Related reading
- How to Choose Survey Software for Your Business: the broader category NPS often runs on top of
- How to Choose Customer Onboarding Software: one of the moments a transactional NPS trigger fires from
- How to Choose Help Desk Software: check native CSAT and NPS here before buying a fourth tool
- How to Choose Live Chat Software: another channel that often ships its own post-chat rating
- How to Choose a Customer Data Platform: where the score should live once collected
- How to Choose Product Analytics Software: the category NPS gets bolted onto inside the product
- How to Choose OKR Software: for the same care about acquired and retired vendors in a different category
- How to Run a Software Trial: structuring the quarter-long test an NPS trend line actually needs
- Best SurveyMonkey Alternatives: head-to-head detail on the general survey tools this category borders
- Best Customer Success Software 2026: where account health and renewal risk get managed once the score lands

Head of Enterprise Solutions
On this page
- Collecting a score is not running a programme
- What to look for
- Key questions to ask before you buy
- Shortlist
- How to choose: a decision framework
- Pricing: what to expect
- Migration and lock-in
- Frequently asked questions
- What's the difference between transactional and relational NPS software?
- Do we need dedicated NPS software, or can our help desk or CRM handle it?
- What response rate should we expect from an NPS survey?
- How fast should we follow up with a detractor?
- What happened to Delighted, and where should its former customers go?
- Is Hotjar still a standalone NPS or feedback option?
- How is NPS software typically priced, and what's the catch?
- Can one tool run both transactional and relational NPS at once?
- Buy the loop, not the score
- Related reading