Best Nintex Alternatives in 2026: 14 Workflow Platforms Compared

Updated September 2026: pricing verified against every vendor's own pricing page. Nintex still publishes zero dollar figures anywhere on its site, a contact-sales form is the entire pricing page. New this year: Gartner named both Appian and Pega Leaders in its first Magic Quadrant for Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (BOAT), and Microsoft's April 2, 2026 deprecation of Azure ACS for SharePoint Online put a hard deadline under a lot of legacy Nintex-for-SharePoint workflows.

Microsoft Power Automate fits Microsoft 365 shops that want cloud flows and RPA bots inside the tenant they already pay for. Camunda fits developer-led teams that want to own a BPMN 2.0 engine outright instead of clicking through a vendor's low-code designer. Rework fits an ops team that wants workflow, approvals, and e-signature bundled with CRM and HR under one predictable annual bill instead of Nintex's separate modules and an undisclosed quote. This guide sorts all 14 alternatives below on what actually forces a Nintex evaluation in 2026, not feature parity first.

Two things push Nintex buyers into this list more than any feature gap. First, Nintex is one of the only platforms in this whole category that publishes literally nothing: no starting price, no tier name, no range, just a form that reads "Talk with our sales team to explore how Nintex can support your goals." Second, for teams running Nintex on SharePoint, the timing is worse than a quiet frustration: the SharePoint 2013 workflow engine has reached end of support, and Microsoft deprecated Azure ACS for SharePoint Online on April 2, 2026, the authentication layer a lot of older Nintex-for-SharePoint workflows depend on. Nintex's own guidance now routes on-premises customers toward Nintex Automation K2 and the K2 for SharePoint SPFx integration, and Nintex Kryon RPA's public APIs are being deprecated too, with Nintex's own public APIs named as the replacement. Nintex is also unusual in pairing workflow with document generation and eSign in one suite, so an alternative that only automates steps and leaves document assembly to someone else is a real gap for some of these buyers, not a footnote; the Best Business Process Management Software hub covers the wider category if a Nintex-shaped switch isn't quite your starting point. Every price below is quoted straight from each vendor's own pricing page as of September 2026, monthly versus annual stated explicitly, with (reported) used only where a vendor genuinely won't print a number.

Key Facts

• The global workflow automation market is projected to grow from $27.91 billion in 2026 to $65.26 billion by 2034, an 11.20% compound annual growth rate. (Fortune Business Insights)
• The global digital signature market is projected to grow from $13.70 billion in 2026 to $154.52 billion by 2034, a 35.40% compound annual growth rate. (Fortune Business Insights)
• Gartner named both Appian and Pega Leaders in its inaugural Magic Quadrant for Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies, published October 2025. (Appian)
• Microsoft deprecated Azure ACS for SharePoint Online on April 2, 2026, the authentication layer many legacy Nintex-for-SharePoint workflows depend on. (Nintex)
• 89% of development executives said their firm is either currently implementing or actively planning a citizen developer strategy, per Forrester's Developer Survey, 2025. (Forrester)

Quick Comparison Table

What Each Alternative Actually Replaces: Workflow Only vs. Workflow Plus Document Generation

This is the split most competitor roundups skip, and it's the one that matters most for a Nintex buyer specifically. Nintex doesn't sell a single product, it sells workflow automation, document generation (its Drawloop-style templated document assembly), and eSign together, plus RPA through Kryon. Most of the 14 alternatives below only replace the workflow piece. If your Nintex apps lean heavily on generating contracts, proposals, or forms from a template, a workflow-only alternative leaves that job unfilled and you'll need a second tool next to it.

Laserfiche and Rework are the two entries that come closest to Nintex's own product shape, from opposite directions: Laserfiche matches the document-and-workflow combination but at an enterprise price with a 5-user minimum, while Rework matches the workflow-and-eSign combination but skips templated document assembly entirely. If document generation specifically is the piece you can't lose, Conga is the honest answer, not a workflow platform at all, but the closest thing to Nintex's Drawloop heritage on this list.

1. Microsoft Power Automate: The Cloud-Flow Alternative Microsoft Already Sells You

Power Automate is the automation layer of the Microsoft Power Platform, and for a Nintex-for-SharePoint customer specifically, it's the most obvious first evaluation: it's built by the same company that just deprecated Azure ACS underneath older Nintex SharePoint workflows, and it already ships inside most Microsoft 365 tenants. Cloud flows handle the same trigger-and-action automation Nintex workflows do, desktop and cloud RPA bots extend into unattended process automation, and Process Mining adds visibility into how a process actually runs versus how it's documented.

Premium runs $15 per user per month paid yearly, a separate line from the Process and Hosted Process bot pricing: unattended bots run $150 per bot per month paid yearly, and hosted (cloud-run) bots run $215 per bot per month paid yearly. Process Mining is a $5,000 per tenant per month add-on, paid yearly, available only alongside Premium. A free trial is available. For a Nintex customer whose real workflows are simple approval chains and document routing inside SharePoint or Teams, Power Automate is often the cheapest realistic replacement, provided the bot and mining costs stay out of the budget. The Power Automate vs Nintex head-to-head runs that swap in full, including what a Nintex quote has to beat once the bot lines are counted.

Pricing: Premium $15/user/month paid yearly. Process (unattended bot) $150/bot/month paid yearly. Hosted Process $215/bot/month paid yearly. Process Mining add-on $5,000/tenant/month paid yearly, requires Premium. Free trial available. (Microsoft) Best for: Microsoft 365 shops, especially Nintex-for-SharePoint customers already navigating the Azure ACS deprecation, who want cloud flows and RPA in the tenant they already pay for. Not ideal for: A team whose Nintex workflows lean heavily on document generation and eSign; Power Automate handles neither natively and needs connectors for both.

2. Appian: Enterprise Governance, With No Price Until You Call

Appian belongs on this list for the Nintex buyer whose real complaint was never workflow steps, it was governance depth: case management, audit trails, and process orchestration built for insurance, banking, or government work. Gartner named Appian a Leader in its inaugural Magic Quadrant for Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (BOAT), published October 2025, the framework that replaced the older iBPMS category and folded in process orchestration, connectivity, and agentic automation as one market. For the fuller field in this exact category, Best Appian Alternatives covers the matchup on its own, and if the real question is Appian versus its closest enterprise rival, Appian vs Pega runs that comparison directly.

Appian sells Standard, Advanced, and Premium editions, each priced per user, per month, per app, not a flat per-seat rate, so two teams with identical headcounts can land on very different bills depending on how many separate applications they build. None of the three editions carries a public dollar figure; every quote runs through sales. A free Community Edition exists for personal development and learning, explicitly not licensed for production traffic, a reasonable way to test the modeling experience before that first sales call.

Pricing: Standard, Advanced, and Premium editions, each priced per user per month per app, no dollar figure published. Community Edition free for personal development only, not production. (Appian) Best for: Regulated enterprises that need governed, audited case management and are prepared to run pricing through a sales evaluation. Not ideal for: A team that just wants a Nintex-style workflow replacement with a visible starting price; Appian's per-app enterprise pricing is a different conversation entirely.

3. Camunda: The Open-Source BPMN Engine Built for Developers, Not Admins

Camunda takes the opposite approach from Nintex's low-code, drag-and-drop designer: it's a BPMN 2.0 process orchestration engine built for developers, with Zeebe as the execution core, meant to be embedded, versioned, and deployed through code rather than clicked together by a business user. For a Nintex customer whose workflows have outgrown a visual designer and need real branching logic, retries, and API-first orchestration, Camunda is the honest next step up, not a like-for-like swap.

Self-Managed Development is free, runs locally, and is explicitly non-production, no license required. Self-Managed Production needs an Enterprise license, which requires a sales conversation. Camunda's SaaS offering gives a 30-day free trial with full execution; after that, the free tier drops to modeling only, with no runtime execution included. No dollar figure is published anywhere on Camunda's pricing page.

Pricing: Self-Managed Development free (local, non-production, no license). Self-Managed Production requires an Enterprise license, sales conversation. SaaS offers a 30-day free trial with full execution, then modeling-only. No dollar figure published. (Camunda) Best for: Developer-led teams that want to own a BPMN 2.0 orchestration engine outright, embedded into their own applications rather than configured through a vendor's UI. Not ideal for: A business-user-led team that liked Nintex's drag-and-drop designer specifically; Camunda expects engineers, not process owners, to build the flows.

4. Kissflow: The No-Code Builder With the Same Pricing Opacity as Nintex

Kissflow built its reputation on no-code process and app building for business users, no developer required, and it's a fair structural comparison to Nintex on the "no-code first" positioning. What it shares with Nintex less flatteringly is pricing opacity: as of September 2026, kissflow.com/pricing sells a consultation-led, fixed annual agreement quoted per organization, with the page itself stating "Pricing built around the value you generate" and "No surprise costs" rather than any tier or dollar figure. Older circulating numbers for Kissflow (a widely repeated $1,500/month figure) no longer reflect what the vendor's own page shows and should be treated as dead.

For the closest matchup on this exact "no-code process builder" question, Best Kissflow Alternatives runs the comparison directly, and Kissflow vs Pipefy is the head-to-head if those two are your actual shortlist.

Pricing: Not published on Kissflow's pricing page; sold as a fixed annual agreement quoted per organization. (Kissflow) Best for: Business teams that already know they want a no-code process and app builder and are comfortable evaluating price through a sales call. Not ideal for: A budget-conscious team wanting to self-serve a price comparison; Kissflow offers exactly as little pricing transparency as Nintex does.

5. Pipefy: The Free Tier That's Actually Usable, Until It Isn't

Pipefy takes a kanban-first approach: each card represents a case or record moving through a process, aimed at operations teams (procurement, HR, finance shared services) wanting a visual, no-developer-required way to build a workflow-backed app. What separates Pipefy from most "free tier" marketing on this list is that Starter is genuinely usable, not a crippled trial: up to 5 processes, 10 users, 50 cards per month, 2GB storage, and 500 database records, with no credit card required and 1,000 AI credits included every month, even on the free plan.

Business moves to per-user billing with unlimited processes and users, up to 10,000 database records, and 20GB storage, but Pipefy does not publish a dollar figure for it; Enterprise is similarly unpriced. For a closer look at this specific matchup, Best Pipefy Alternatives covers it directly, and Kissflow vs Pipefy is the head-to-head against the previous entry on this list.

Pricing: Starter free (5 processes, 10 users, 50 cards/month, 500 database records, 2GB storage). Business and Enterprise custom, contact sales. (Pipefy) Best for: Operations teams wanting a genuinely free tier to build their first process before any budget conversation starts. Not ideal for: A team already past 10 users or 5 active processes; that's a Business-tier conversation with no visible starting price attached.

6. Rework: One Platform Instead of a Workflow Tool, a CRM, and an HR Tool

Rework's argument in this category is consolidation, not process-engine depth or document-assembly depth to match Nintex's Drawloop heritage. Workflow, BPM, Request (approvals), Task, Project, Docs, and E-Sign are live modules on one platform, next to a Sales CRM, Lead Management, the People app (HRIS, timesheets, payroll), and a unified inbox spanning WhatsApp, Messenger, Instagram DM, web chat, email, and SMS. Where Nintex bundles workflow with document generation and eSign, Rework bundles workflow with eSign too, but the buyer it fits is different: a 10 to 200 person mid-market ops team tired of a workflow tool, a CRM, and an HR tool that only talk to each other through brittle integrations, or don't talk at all.

Unlike Nintex, Rework actually publishes a real price: Work Ops Starter runs $999 a year for up to 10 users (a hard cap), and Work Ops Standard is $1,999 a year with 20 users included, then $6 per user per month for each additional seat. A 25-seat team lands at $2,359 a year and 100 seats lands at $7,759 a year, all billed annually, numbers you can compute yourself without a call, which is the whole point next to a vendor whose pricing page is a contact form.

Rework is not a BPMN 2.0 process-orchestration engine, and it doesn't compete with Camunda or Appian on executable process modeling, case-management depth, or regulated audit trails. It has no RPA offering to match Nintex's Kryon product line. And it doesn't replace Nintex's document-generation depth, the templated document assembly (contracts, proposals, forms) that Nintex built its Drawloop acquisition around, or Nintex's SharePoint-native workflow story; a team migrating off SharePoint 2013 workflows specifically needs a SharePoint-aware answer like Power Automate, not Rework.

Pricing: Work Ops Starter $999/year, up to 10 users (hard cap). Work Ops Standard $1,999/year, 20 users included, then $6/user/month for each additional user. Worked totals: 25 seats = $2,359/year, 100 seats = $7,759/year. All billed annually. (Rework) Best for: A 10 to 200 person mid-market ops team that wants workflow, approvals, project, task, CRM, and People management under one login instead of three or four separate tools stitched together. Not ideal for: Teams needing BPMN process-orchestration depth, RPA, Nintex-grade templated document generation, or a SharePoint-native migration path; also not a fit for a solo buyer, the Starter tier is built for a 10-person team.

7. Quickbase: The No-Code Database That Actually Publishes a Per-User Price

Quickbase approaches this category from the opposite direction of Nintex: it's a no-code relational database and app builder first, with workflow automations layered on top of the apps you build, rather than a workflow engine with a database bolted on. For a Nintex customer whose real need was closer to "build a tracked, structured app" than "orchestrate a complex approval chain," Quickbase can be a better-fit switch than a pure workflow competitor. The dedicated Best Quickbase Alternatives guide covers this exact category from Quickbase's own side, worth a look if the database angle matters more to you than the workflow angle.

Quickbase is one of the few vendors on this whole list that prints a real per-user dollar figure: Team runs from $35 per user per month, and Business runs from $55 per user per month, both priced annually, with a 30-day free trial. The catch, stated on Quickbase's own pricing page, is "Cost shown does not include platform minimum," a fee Quickbase never quantifies, plus the requirement that "All users must be on the same plan."

Pricing: Team from $35/user/month, priced annually. Business from $55/user/month, priced annually. Enterprise custom. 30-day free trial. Platform minimum applies on top, unquantified. (Quickbase) Best for: A team whose Nintex apps were really structured trackers with a few automated alerts, better served by a database-first tool than a pure workflow engine. Not ideal for: A team whose Nintex use was genuinely complex, branching workflow orchestration; Quickbase's automations sit inside its apps rather than standing alone as a process engine.

8. Process Street: Checklist-First SOPs, With No Price on the Page Either

Process Street takes a different shape from Nintex entirely: instead of a visual flowchart or BPMN diagram, a process is a checklist, a series of ordered steps with conditional logic, form fields, and approvals attached, aimed squarely at recurring operational SOPs (employee onboarding, vendor intake, monthly close) rather than complex case management. For a Nintex customer whose real workflows are closer to "make sure everyone follows the same steps in order" than "orchestrate a multi-branch business process," the checklist model is often easier for non-technical staff to both build and follow.

Process Street sells Startup, Pro, and Enterprise tiers, and like Nintex, publishes no dollar figure on its own pricing page. Startup carries a 5-user minimum, up to 5,000 Data Set records, 100 automation actions per month, and 50 API calls per month. Pro raises the Data Set ceiling to 10,000 records. Enterprise removes the API call cap entirely. For the closest matchup on this exact checklist-first question, Best Process Street Alternatives runs the comparison directly.

Pricing: Startup, Pro, and Enterprise tiers, no dollar figures published. Startup: 5-user minimum, 5,000 Data Set records, 100 automation actions/month, 50 API calls/month. Pro: 10,000 Data Set records. Enterprise: unlimited API calls. (Process Street) Best for: Ops teams running recurring, checklist-driven SOPs (onboarding, intake, monthly close) who want a simpler mental model than a flowchart-style workflow builder. Not ideal for: A team needing genuine branching process orchestration or case management; Process Street's checklist model isn't built for that complexity.

9. Laserfiche: Enterprise Content Management With Workflow Built In, at an Enterprise Price

Laserfiche is the entry on this list that structurally resembles Nintex the most: it pairs document management (an actual ECM, not just file storage) with workflow automation and forms, aimed at regulated industries (government, healthcare, financial services) that need both a system of record for documents and the process logic that moves them through review and approval. For a Nintex customer whose apps genuinely combined document handling with workflow, not just triggers and approvals, Laserfiche is a closer functional match than most of the pure workflow tools on this list.

That match comes at a price. Professional runs $73 per user per month billed annually, with a 5-user minimum, putting the realistic entry cost well above every workflow-only competitor here. Business steps up to $93 per user per month billed annually with a 25-user minimum. Business+ prices at $42 per user per month billed annually, but only at a 500-user minimum, so it's cheaper per seat purely because it requires 500 seats to buy in at all, never treat that $42 figure as an entry price. Cloud Starter and the self-hosted Laserfiche 12 product carry no published figure.

Pricing: Professional $73/user/month billed annually, 5-user minimum. Business $93/user/month billed annually, 25-user minimum. Business+ $42/user/month billed annually, 500-user minimum. Cloud Starter and self-hosted Laserfiche 12 carry no published figure. (Laserfiche) Best for: Regulated teams whose Nintex use combined real document management with workflow, and who can absorb an enterprise-tier price for that combination. Not ideal for: A small team or one without genuine document-management needs; the 5-user minimum and $73/user/month entry price price out most simple workflow-only use cases.

10. Decisions: BPM Built to Explicitly Reject Per-User Pricing

Decisions (which absorbed ProcessMaker, no longer a standalone brand) is a low-code BPM and intelligent automation platform combining workflow, forms, and robotic process automation in one product. Its own pricing page makes an unusually direct claim for this category: "Decisions isn't built around restrictive per-user pricing," positioning itself against the per-seat math that Quickbase, Kintone, and Zoho Creator all use.

The claim comes without a number attached to back it up. Foundation, Growth, and Enterprise are the three named tiers, and every one of them requires a custom quote, no dollar figures published anywhere on the page. For a Nintex buyer whose primary complaint was per-user licensing creep as their process footprint grew, Decisions' stated philosophy is worth evaluating directly, but the actual number still requires the same sales call Nintex itself demands.

Pricing: Foundation, Growth, and Enterprise tiers, no dollar figures published, custom quote per tier. (Decisions) Best for: A team specifically frustrated by per-user pricing creep on a workflow tool, willing to verify Decisions' "not per-user" claim through its own sales process. Not ideal for: A budget-conscious buyer wanting a self-serve number before a call; Decisions offers no more pricing transparency than Nintex does.

11. Creatio: BPM Bundled Into a CRM, Behind a $10,000 Minimum

Creatio's process engine grew out of a CRM platform, and that lineage still shows: its real differentiator is BPM tooling built natively alongside sales, marketing, and service CRM modules, rather than bolted onto a generic canvas. As of its current pricing, Creatio sells Growth, Enterprise, and a newer Unlimited tier aimed at organizations that would rather budget per organization than per seat.

Growth runs $40 per user per month, and Enterprise runs $75 per user per month; both require a minimum annual purchase of $10,000, on a standard 3-year contract. That minimum matters more than the headline per-user rate: a 10-person team at $40/user/month nominally owes $4,800 a year, but the $10,000 floor applies regardless, so quoting $40 without mentioning it is genuinely misleading. Unlimited has no per-user limits at all, priced custom. Add-on products (Sales, Marketing, Service) run $15 per user per month each, and AI packages range from $5,000 per year (500K credits) to $150,000 per year (8M credits).

Pricing: Growth $40/user/month. Enterprise $75/user/month. Both require a $10,000/year minimum purchase, standard 3-year contract. Unlimited tier custom, no per-user limits. Add-on products (Sales, Marketing, Service) $15/user/month each. (Creatio) Best for: Teams wanting BPM and app building bundled natively with CRM, with budget already cleared for a $10,000+ annual commitment. Not ideal for: A small team hoping the $40/user/month headline rate reflects their real cost; the $10,000 minimum makes Creatio expensive well below that seat count.

12. Zoho Creator: The Budget No-Code Builder With Workflow Rules Included

Zoho Creator is the closest thing on this list to a genuine budget option: a no-code app builder with workflow automation built in, sold alongside 55-plus other Zoho apps that many small businesses already run their operations on. A Free Edition covers one custom app, and every paid tier ships with a 15-day free trial and no credit card required, lower friction than Nintex's sales-gated evaluation path.

Standard runs $8 per user per month billed annually, Professional runs $20 per user per month billed annually, and Enterprise runs $25 per user per month billed annually; a Flex tier is priced custom. Zoho's own pricing page states "Yearly, save more than 30%," which means month-to-month costs more, though Zoho does not publish what that monthly figure actually is, so don't quote one.

Pricing: Standard $8/user/month billed annually. Professional $20/user/month billed annually. Enterprise $25/user/month billed annually. Flex custom. Free Edition covers one app. 15-day free trial, no credit card. Yearly billing saves over 30% versus an unpublished monthly rate. (Zoho Creator) Best for: Budget-conscious small teams already inside the Zoho ecosystem wanting a cheap, published no-code app and workflow builder. Not ideal for: A team that needs the monthly (non-annual) price before committing; Zoho Creator's page simply doesn't publish one.

13. Tallyfy: The Cheapest Real Published Price on This Entire List

Tallyfy documents and tracks recurring processes as ordered, trackable checklists, closer in spirit to Process Street than to a BPMN engine, aimed at small and mid-size teams wanting their SOPs to actually get followed rather than live in a static document. What separates Tallyfy from nearly everything else in this guide is that it's the only vendor with both a real published dollar figure and no seat minimum at all.

Full Seat runs $300 per year on an annual plan (working out to $25 per month), or $30 per month on a month-to-month contract. Light Seat, a reduced-permission role, runs $100 per year annual, or $10 per month month-to-month. A Data Feed analytics add-on runs $20 per seat per year, annual billing only. The minimum purchase is a single seat, and a 14-day free trial is available before committing to either plan.

Pricing: Full Seat $300/year annual ($25/month equivalent), or $30/month month-to-month. Light Seat $100/year annual, or $10/month month-to-month. Data Feed add-on $20/seat/year, annual only. Minimum 1 seat. 14-day free trial. (Tallyfy) Best for: Small teams wanting real, published, low-cost process documentation and tracking, with no seat floor forcing them to buy more licenses than they need. Not ideal for: A team needing complex branching workflow logic, RPA, or document generation; Tallyfy's checklist model doesn't reach that depth.

14. Conga: Document Generation and CLM, Not Workflow, Nintex's Other Half

Conga earns its place on this list for a specific reason: it isn't a workflow engine at all, and it doesn't pretend to be one. What it does is document generation (Conga Composer, templated assembly of contracts, proposals, and forms from structured data) and contract lifecycle management (CLM), the exact piece of Nintex's product line that most workflow-only competitors in this guide simply don't touch. If your Nintex evaluation started because a workflow alternative left your document generation unsolved, Conga is the honest, direct answer to that specific gap.

Neither Conga Composer nor Conga CLM carries a published dollar figure. Pricing is entirely quote-based, reached through a contact form rather than a self-serve pricing page, no more transparent than Nintex's own page. Pair Conga with a workflow tool from earlier in this list (Power Automate, Camunda, or Rework for the eSign piece) if your real need spans both automation and document assembly, the combination Nintex itself sells as one product.

Pricing: Not published for Conga Composer or CLM. Quote-based, contact form only. (Conga) Best for: A team whose specific gap after leaving Nintex is document generation and contract lifecycle management, not workflow automation. Not ideal for: A team wanting a single tool that replaces Nintex's workflow layer; Conga needs to be paired with something else on this list for that.

Cost at 10, 25, and 100 Users

Built only from published rates; vendors with no printed dollar figure simply have no number to put in the cell, which is itself the finding worth noting given how many vendors on this list share Nintex's pricing opacity.

Rework and Zoho Creator are the two rows worth studying together at 10 seats: Rework's $999 covers a full 10-user Work Ops plan as a fixed package, while Zoho Creator's $960 is a per-user total that starts climbing the moment an 11th person joins. Quickbase's row carries the loudest asterisk on this table, its per-user total is real and published, but the undisclosed platform minimum stacked on top means the true number in every cell is higher than what's shown.

Stage Fit: Where Each Tool Wins as You Scale

Sizing and Persona Fit

How to Choose: Decision Framework

Start with the capability your current Nintex setup cannot lose, then use it to narrow the shortlist.

If what you actually lost patience with is diagramming and process documentation rather than a running workflow engine, that's a different tool category entirely, covered in Best Visio Alternatives and Best Creately Alternatives.

What to Do Next

Start by sorting the list above into the split that actually matches your Nintex use case: workflow-only or workflow-plus-document-generation. If your Nintex apps leaned on document assembly and eSign as much as on process steps, trial Laserfiche or pair Conga with a workflow tool like Power Automate or Rework, and track what each combination would have cost against your real Nintex bill. If your use case was pure process automation, run a two-week pilot against your top two or three existing Nintex workflows on Power Automate (if you're Microsoft-centric) and one no-code competitor (Kissflow, Pipefy, or Process Street), and get a written quote from each before your Nintex contract renewal date arrives, not after.