Best Kaspr Alternatives in 2026: 12 Tools Compared on Data Accuracy, Credit Cost and Compliance

By Laurel · Updated Oct 22, 2026

The best Kaspr alternative depends on why you're leaving. If your reps still want a LinkedIn extension and more phone reveals, Lusha, ContactOut and SignalHire are the nearest swaps. If you want one tool that also runs outreach, Apollo.io is the obvious move. If a compliance team vetoed Kaspr after the French regulator's fine, you need a vendor that can answer questions about where its contacts come from, and Cognism and Lusha publish the most on that. And if you mostly need verified emails, Hunter and Snov.io cost far less than a phone-first tool.

Kaspr is a LinkedIn Chrome extension that reveals phone numbers and emails for prospects, sold in euros, and aimed at European SDRs and small sales teams. Disclosure: Cognism owns Kaspr, so Cognism appears below as an alternative with that relationship stated. Kaspr is cheap, rolls credits over, and has a free plan, and none of that is the reason people leave. They leave over credit ceilings, narrow coverage outside Europe, one big regulatory decision, or a wish for data plus outreach in a single tool.

This page is for someone replacing Kaspr, so it covers three things in order: how accurate and verified the data is, how each credit model charges for phone numbers, and what GDPR, PDPA, CCPA and call-screening rules mean for the way you'll use a contact database. If you're still choosing a category rather than replacing a tool, start with the best sales intelligence tools hub or the wider LinkedIn contact finder roundup.

We evaluated each tool on email and phone data quality, credit pricing, regional fit, free-tier limits and the compliance claims each vendor makes publicly. Prices are the vendor's own figures with their billing term. Where a vendor publishes no price, we say so, and a reported range appears only where a named source exists.

Key Facts

• The French regulator fined Kaspr EUR 240,000 for collecting LinkedIn contacts through its Chrome extension into a database of about 160 million contacts (EDPB, 23 January 2025).
• Salesforce's State of Sales report says reps spend almost one full day of their workweek on prospecting, so every wasted reveal compounds across a team.
• In the same report, 46% of sales professionals with agents say data quality issues hurt their sales, and teams run an average of eight standalone tools.
• The UK ICO fined Energy Prices Direct £160,000 on 20 May 2026 for over 700,000 unsolicited marketing calls to numbers on the TPS and Corporate TPS registers, including businesses.
• The FTC says the US National Do Not Call Registry rule "does not apply to business-to-business calls", though other call rules can still apply.

Quick Comparison Table

Why Teams Leave Kaspr

Kaspr's own pricing page is published and per user per month. Free is EUR 0 with 15 B2B email credits, 5 phone credits and 5 direct email credits a month. Starter is EUR 45 billed annually or EUR 59 billed monthly, with unlimited B2B email, 100 phone credits a month and 5 direct email credits. Business is EUR 79 billed annually or EUR 99 billed monthly, with 200 phone and 200 direct email credits. Organization is annual only with a five-user minimum. Credits roll over on paid plans and are shared across users.

None of that is opaque, which is part of why Kaspr wins its first purchase. The reasons teams look elsewhere come later. The table sorts what the public record supports from what you should test yourself.

Nothing here says Kaspr's data is bad. It says the product is small and priced for individual reps, and the compliance record is something a larger buyer will have to explain internally. If you're a one-person SDR operation in France or Germany who wants the cheapest mobile numbers, staying is a reasonable choice.

What Kaspr Does Well

Credit where it's due. Kaspr puts European phone numbers into a LinkedIn workflow at a low per-user price. Its data page says emails are re-validated every two months and cites 120+ data sources. It describes itself as GDPR and CCPA aligned, adds recruiter features on the Business plan, and lets unused credits roll over, which most rivals don't.

An alternative has to beat that on at least one axis that matters to you. That could be more phones per seat, better coverage outside Europe, a cleaner compliance story, or built-in outreach.

Credit Models and Phone Costs Compared

Phone credits are where bills surprise people. Every tool below charges more for a mobile than for an email, and the multiple varies a lot.

The practical lesson: don't compare cost per credit, compare cost per connected conversation. A cheap credit with a poor mobile match rate can cost more per dial that connects than a pricier credit with a good one. That's why the test near the end of this page matters more than any price table.

Data Accuracy and Verification

Vendors publish accuracy claims, and they are claims, not audits. Lusha says 98% email accuracy and 85% US and 86% global phone accuracy. Apollo says its email accuracy is 98%. UpLead states a 95% data accuracy rate. LeadIQ cites 85% global mobile match and 70% in EMEA. Prospeo claims 98% accuracy and 125M+ verified mobiles on its data page. Cognism frames its edge as phone verification rather than a percentage, and Kaspr and SignalHire publish no accuracy figure at all.

Notice that "accuracy", "deliverability" and "match rate" aren't the same measurement, and that the LeadIQ EMEA figure is lower than its global one. If your reason for using Kaspr was European depth, that detail matters more than a headline percentage.

Contact data also ages whether or not a vendor refreshes it. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports median tenure with the current employer was 4.1 years in January 2026, and its JOLTS release shows 3.2 percent total separations in August. Neither is a data-decay rate, but both show how fast the people in a database change jobs. A direct dial for someone who left last quarter wastes a rep's call and, in some jurisdictions, can create a compliance problem.

Verification practice matters more than database size:

• Ask how mobiles are verified. Human calls, carrier lookups and community signals are different methods with different failure modes.
• Ask what happens to bad data. Charging only for found or verified results, which FullEnrich, RocketReach and SignalHire do, shifts risk to the vendor.
• Ask how often senior contacts are refreshed. Cognism says 30 days for Director and above. Get the same answer in writing from every rival.
• Test catch-all domains. An email at a catch-all domain can pass verification and still bounce.

If you also send email at volume, Google's rules for bulk senders require spam rates below 0.30%, so a bad list hurts deliverability for your whole domain, not only one campaign. Our email finder roundup covers that side in depth.

Compliance: GDPR, PDPA, CCPA and Phone Data

Phone data is where regulators look first, and the rules differ by country. This is a plain-language map, not legal advice. Your counsel owns the call on your use case.

Three points trip teams up.

1. Source matters, and Kaspr is the example. The CNIL's decision turned on how contacts were collected: a Chrome extension that pulled details from LinkedIn members who had restricted who could see their information, with breaches of GDPR Articles 5, 6, 12, 14 and 15 cited. That's a decision about one vendor, but the question applies to every LinkedIn-based tool on this page. Ask any vendor where its contacts come from and how it handles opt-outs and deletion requests.
2. B2B is not a free pass. The FTC says its registry rule does not apply to business-to-business calls, yet the ICO fined a company for calling TPS and CTPS-registered numbers, businesses included. The US exemption and the UK rule point in opposite directions, and a team that dials both has to follow the stricter one.
3. Screening is a feature to price in. Cognism bundles DNC screening in the UK, the US, Australia, New Zealand and several European countries. Most self-serve tools don't claim the same, so budget for a separate screening step before outbound calls.

Compliance badges also need reading. Lusha lists GDPR (ePrivacyseal), CCPA (TrustArc), SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27701, and its plan comparison includes a do-not-call row. Apollo states GDPR compliance on a legitimate-interest basis plus SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001, with no CCPA or DNC statement on its data page. RocketReach holds SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001. Hunter says GDPR and CCPA and hosts on Google Cloud in Belgium, with no SOC 2 or ISO claim on its security page. Snov.io says GDPR and CCPA. A badge tells you the vendor has a program, not that your campaign is lawful.

Stage Fit Matrix

1. Lusha: The Nearest Swap for LinkedIn Extension Users

Lusha is the first name most Kaspr users try, because the workflow is the same: open a profile, click reveal. The difference is how it's priced. Lusha charges by plan, not by seat. On Lusha's pricing page: Free gives 40 credits a month for one user; Starter is $37.45 a month billed annually ($449.10 a year) or $49.90 billed monthly, with 400 credits a month; Pro is $52.45 annual or $69.90 monthly with 600 credits and 2 free seats; Premium is $299.95 annual or $399.90 monthly with 3,400 credits and 5 free seats. Scale is custom.

An email costs 1 credit and a phone 5, so a Starter plan covers 80 phone reveals a month if you spend nothing on email. Monthly plans roll over up to twice the monthly cap, and annual credits are issued upfront and reset at year end. Lusha claims 515M+ contacts and 85% US and 86% global phone accuracy, and it publishes a fuller compliance list than most tools here. Over five users means a sales conversation. If Lusha's credit math doesn't fit either, the Lusha alternatives cover the same ground from Lusha's side.

Best for: SDRs and small teams who want the same click-to-reveal flow with US coverage. Not ideal for: heavy phone volume on a tight budget.

2. Cognism: European Mobiles With Call Screening (and Kaspr's Parent)

Cognism owns Kaspr, so choosing it doesn't leave the group, but it does move you to the premium product. Cognism's pricing page lists two plans, Standard and Pro, sold on request after a demo, with five seats included and credits attached to each seat. One credit reveals one contact, viewing a revealed contact again is free, and you're re-charged only when the contact changes jobs. There's a demo and a free data sample rather than a free trial.

Reported figures exist: Amplemarket, citing Vendr data, reports roughly $15,000 for the platform plus about $1,500 per user per year on Standard, and roughly $25,000 plus about $2,500 per user per year on Pro. Source: Amplemarket. That's a secondary, reported source, not a Cognism quote.

Cognism says its phone-verified mobiles deliver up to three times higher connect rates, refreshes Director-and-above data every 30 days, and screens against do-not-call lists in the UK (TPS and CTPS), the US, Australia, New Zealand and several European countries. It lists GDPR, CCPA, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, SOC 2 Type II and California data broker registration on its compliance page, and the page's count of screened lists differs across its own pages, so ask for the exact countries. For a fuller treatment, read our Cognism alternatives page.

Best for: European outbound teams that need call screening. Not ideal for: small teams that want published prices.

3. Apollo.io: Data Plus Sequencing in One Tool

Apollo is the usual answer when a Kaspr user says, "I'm tired of pasting emails into another tool." Apollo's pricing shows Free at $0 (900 credits per seat per year, granted monthly), Basic at $49 per seat per month billed annually or $65 billed monthly, Professional at $79 annual or $99 monthly, and Organization at $119 annual with a three-seat minimum (annual only). Annual billing saves 24%.

Credits are pooled across the team and don't roll over. An email costs 1 credit and a phone number 8, so a free seat covers about nine phone reveals a month if nothing else is spent. Apollo claims 240M+ contacts and 30M+ companies, with GDPR compliance on a legitimate-interest basis, and its sequencing and dialer sit alongside the data. That's the main reason to choose it over a reveal-only tool like Kaspr. See also our Apollo alternatives guide.

Best for: self-serve teams that want outreach included. Not ideal for: teams that need screened European mobiles.

4. ContactOut: Phones and Personal Emails Cheaply

ContactOut offers a free plan (5 emails, 5 phones and 5 exports a day). Paid plans: Email at $49 a month billed monthly or $468 a year; Email plus Phone at $99 monthly or $948 a year, with 600 exports a month or 7,200 a year. Plans carry a "1 user per company limit", so a paid plan is a single seat. "Unlimited" is capped at 2,000 email credits and 1,000 phone credits per account per month under its terms.

Its data page claims 800M profiles, 100M direct dials, a "triple verified" process, and CCPA and GDPR compliance with SOC 2. The pricing page says 700 million profiles, so confirm which figure applies. ContactOut leans on LinkedIn-sourced and personal-email data, the same territory the CNIL examined with Kaspr, so ask it the same source and opt-out questions you'd ask anyone. It's the closest like-for-like on workflow. See our ContactOut alternatives page for the wider field.

Best for: individual reps and recruiters. Not ideal for: teams that need shared seats.

5. SignalHire: Unlimited Users, Charged on Success

SignalHire charges per credit with unlimited users on every plan, credits shared. Free gives 5 credits (10 a month with the browser extension). Email plans run $49 a month for 600 credits or $69 for 1,000 billed monthly, or $469 and $689 a year billed annually. Phone and email-and-phone plans run $49 for 300 credits or $69 for 435 a month. Unlimited plans exist at $79 monthly for emails and $99 for phones, with a fair-use cap of 2,000 credits a month. A credit is charged only if at least one email or phone comes back.

SignalHire claims 900M+ profiles and states GDPR and CCPA compliance. It publishes no accuracy percentage, which is worth noting if accuracy drives your decision. A shared pool suits teams that don't want to count seats.

Best for: teams where many people need occasional lookups. Not ideal for: buyers who want a stated accuracy figure.

6. RocketReach: Pay Only for Found Contacts

On RocketReach's pricing page, monthly billing is Essentials at $49, Pro at $99 and Ultimate at $209, with lookups capped at 100, 250 and 1,000 a month. Annual billing differs by region. The US list shows Essentials from $399 a year and Ultimate at $1,699 a year. Annual plans advertise "unlimited" lookups with a fair-use cap of 10,000 a month, and exports are metered separately (1,200, 3,600 and 20,000 a year). Bulk lookups, CSV, API and CRM pushes all consume exports, which is the detail people miss.

A lookup is charged only if a verified email or phone is found. The free account offers 5 lookups. RocketReach claims 700 million professionals and 98% accuracy, and holds SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001. Team plans start at $6,000 a year. It covers more of the US than a Europe-first tool, which matters if your territory has shifted.

Best for: occasional lookups and small teams. Not ideal for: bulk list building through CSV or API.

7. LeadIQ: LinkedIn Capture Into the CRM

LeadIQ is built for capturing prospects while browsing LinkedIn and pushing them into your CRM. Free gives 1 user and 50 credits. Pro is a credit slider with five users included: 200 credits a month costs $20 billed monthly or $15 billed annually, scaling to 6,750 credits for $290.25 a month on monthly billing. Enterprise is annual only. You can try any plan free for 30 days.

Credits: email 1, phone 10, email plus phone 11, account enrichment 3. LeadIQ cites 750 million+ profiles, up to 200M re-verified monthly, an 85% global mobile match (70% in EMEA) and phone accuracy above 90%, and says every supplier passes a GDPR and CCPA review. The EMEA figure is the one to weigh if you're a European team coming off Kaspr.

Best for: SDR teams working from LinkedIn into a CRM. Not ideal for: European mobile-first outbound.

8. UpLead: One Credit Buys Email and Mobile

UpLead bundles email and mobile direct dial into one credit. A 7-day free trial gives 5 credits. Essentials is $99 a month billed monthly (170 credits) or $74 a month billed annually (2,040 credits a year); Plus is $199 monthly (400 credits) or $149 annual (4,800 a year). Extra credits cost $0.60 and $0.50. Professional is custom, annual only, with team seat management. Free, Essentials and Plus are single-user accounts. UpLead claims a 95% data accuracy rate on email verification.

The bundled credit makes cost per contact easy to model, which suits a Kaspr user who keeps running out of phone credits. The trade-off is small allotments and single-user plans. Ask for its GDPR and CCPA terms and its rollover policy in writing, since the pricing page states neither.

Best for: small teams that want predictable cost per contact. Not ideal for: shared team accounts.

9. Prospeo: Verified Email and Mobile With a Free Tier

Prospeo charges per user. Free gives 100 credits a month; Starter is $49 monthly or $441 a year; Growth is $99 monthly or $888 a year; Pro is $249 monthly or $2,241 a year, with 2,000, 5,000 and 15,000 monthly credits (annual plans grant 24,000, 60,000 and 180,000 upfront). A verified email costs 1 credit and a mobile 10. Credits don't roll over, and add-ons start at 1,000 credits for $10.

Prospeo claims 300M+ profiles, 125M+ verified mobiles and 98% accuracy, and shows a GDPR badge on its pricing page. Treat the mobile count as a vendor claim and test it against your territory. The free tier is generous enough for a real test, which makes it a low-risk first trial for a Kaspr user.

Best for: small teams wanting a free test with mobile data. Not ideal for: teams that want rollover credits.

10. Hunter: Email-First and Cheap to Run

If you left Kaspr because you rarely call and mostly email, Hunter is the cheapest honest answer. It's flat per account with unlimited users on every plan. Free gives 50 credits a month and 1 connected email account. Starter is $49 a month billed monthly or $34 a month billed annually ($408 a year) for 2,000 credits a month; Growth is $149 monthly or $104 annually ($1,248 a year) for 10,000; Scale is $299 monthly or $209 annually ($2,508 a year) for 25,000. Enterprise is custom.

Finding an email costs 1 credit and verifying one costs 0.5. Monthly credits reset, with no rollover; annual plans grant the year's credits upfront. Hunter says it indexes 150M professional email addresses and states GDPR and CCPA, hosted in Belgium, without SOC 2 or ISO claims on its security page. Its pricing is built on email credits, so confirm any phone coverage with the vendor before you buy for calls. Our Hunter alternatives page covers the email-first field in depth.

Best for: email-led prospecting teams. Not ideal for: phone-first SDRs.

11. Snov.io: Email Finding With Outreach Included

Snov.io is flat per account with unlimited team seats, and it bundles outreach. A free trial renews monthly: 50 credits, 100 recipients and 25 enrichment tokens, without bulk, export, API or integrations. Paid plans, monthly versus annual per month: Starter $39 or $29.25 for 1,000 credits; Pro S $99 or $74.25 for 5,000; Pro M $189 or $141.75 for 20,000; Pro L $369 or $276.75 for 50,000; Ultra $738 or $553.50 for 100,000. Annual saves 25%. LinkedIn automation slots cost $69 a month each.

One credit is one prospect, one email search or one verification. Unused credits expire after 30 days but roll over on annual plans or with renewal enabled. Snov.io claims "500M+ verified contacts" on one page while its own FAQ on the same pricing page says over 50 million leads, so don't quote a database size. Its security center states GDPR and CCPA. Confirm phone coverage with the vendor.

Best for: small teams that want email finding and sending together. Not ideal for: buyers who need phone numbers.

12. FullEnrich: Waterfall Enrichment Across Many Sources

FullEnrich isn't a database. It queries many providers in sequence and charges only for found and verified results. The free trial gives 50 credits, with more from inviting teammates. Pro monthly runs from 500 credits for $29 to 100,000 for $3,500; annual plans, about 10% cheaper, include 6,000 credits a year for $26 a month. Credits: work email 1, personal email 3, mobile 10, with landlines free. Rollover is 3 months on monthly plans and 12 months on annual. Users are unlimited on every plan.

It claims 25+ sources and an average find rate of about 80%, and states GDPR, CCPA and SOC 2 Type II without storing its own contact database. The waterfall approach suits teams that already have LinkedIn lists from Kaspr or a Sales Navigator export and want to fill gaps cheaply. It complements a data source rather than replacing one. See also our data enrichment roundup.

Best for: teams enriching existing lists. Not ideal for: building a list from scratch.

Sizing and Persona Table

How to Choose

Questions to Ask Any Vendor Before You Switch

Moving off Kaspr because of a regulatory decision and landing on another LinkedIn-sourced tool without asking questions just repeats the risk. Put these in writing to every finalist.

How to Test Before You Switch

1. Pull a sample of 200 contacts from your real territory, split by country and seniority.
2. Run the same list through two or three candidates on free tiers or trials. Lusha, Apollo.io, Prospeo, Hunter and ContactOut all have free plans, and LeadIQ offers a 30-day trial.
3. Dial a fixed number of mobiles per vendor and record connect rates, wrong numbers and numbers that belong to someone else.
4. Send emails to the verified addresses from a warmed subdomain and measure bounces.
5. Ask each vendor for written answers to the questions above on sourcing, opt-outs, call screening and refresh cadence.
6. Screen numbers yourself against TPS, CTPS or your local registers before the dial test, whatever the vendor says.

Pair this with your ideal customer profile so you test the accounts you actually sell to, and read lead data enrichment if you plan to layer a waterfall on top. For the buying process itself, our guide on how to choose sales intelligence software walks through scoring. If you're comparing against a broader set of providers, the B2B data provider comparison covers the wider market.

What to Do Next

Run the 200-contact test this week. Pick your two likeliest replacements from the How to Choose table, put the seven questions to each, and compare connect rates and bounces side by side on the same list. If you're still weighing categories, return to the sales intelligence hub.