Best SAP Signavio Alternatives in 2026: 15 Process Intelligence and Modelling Platforms

By Linh Ngo · Updated Sep 11, 2026

SAP Signavio still publishes zero dollar figures anywhere, signavio.com/pricing is a "Request a Quote" form with a 30-day free trial and nothing else. SAP's mainstream maintenance for SAP ECC ends in late 2027, with Extended Maintenance available only through 2030, a deadline pushing a lot of SAP shops into exactly the process re-documentation work Signavio and several of the tools below are built for.

SAP Signavio is really two products sharing one login: Process Manager and Collaboration Hub for modelling and documenting a process, and Process Intelligence for mining how that process actually runs from system event-log data. Celonis fits the team whose real gap is the mining half specifically, with no modelling suite wrapped around it. Bizagi fits the team that wants a genuinely free way to model and document a process before committing budget to an execution engine. ARIS fits the enterprise architecture group running an SAP transformation program who needs governance across process, application, and data architecture at roughly the same depth SAP itself sells. This guide sorts all 15 alternatives below by that split, modelling versus mining versus both, not by feature parity, because it is the decision that determines which shortlist you should even be looking at.

Two things push a Signavio evaluation in 2026 specifically, and neither is a feature gap. First, Signavio's own pricing is modular and named-user-based (Process Manager per named user, Collaboration Hub per block of 10 named users, Process Intelligence per block of 200,000 records), and not one dollar figure appears anywhere on SAP's site for any of it, every quote runs through SAP sales. Second, the SAP ECC maintenance deadline above means a lot of buyers are shopping for a modelling tool right now for a reason that has nothing to do with Signavio's own quality, they need to re-document processes for an S/4HANA move, and Signavio is only one of several ways to do that. If your evaluation started because Signavio's price is invisible, several tools below solve that exact problem with a real number. If it started because you only needed one half of what Signavio sells, the split later in this guide tells you which half, and which shorter, cheaper list, to actually shop. Every price below states whether it is billed monthly or annually. For the wider BPM category this guide sits inside, see Best Business Process Management Software.

Key Facts

• The global business process management software market is projected to grow from $25.88 billion in 2026 to $91.87 billion by 2034, a 17.2% compound annual growth rate. (Fortune Business Insights)
• 48% of organizations reported company-wide process mining adoption in 2025, up from 45% in 2021, and 80% agreed process mining delivers added value, per Deloitte's Global Process Mining Survey. (Process Excellence Network)
• Gartner named both Appian and Pega Leaders in its inaugural Magic Quadrant for Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies, published October 2025. (Appian)
• SAP's mainstream maintenance for SAP ERP 6.0 (SAP ECC) ends in late 2027, with Extended Maintenance available only through the end of 2030. (IBsolution)
• 89% of development executives said their firm is either currently implementing or actively planning a citizen developer strategy, per Forrester's Developer Survey, 2025. (Forrester)

Quick Comparison Table

What Each Alternative Actually Replaces: Modelling vs. Mining vs. Both

This is the split that decides which of the 15 tools above even belongs on your shortlist, and it is the one most competitor roundups skip. Signavio bundles modelling and documentation (Process Manager, Collaboration Hub) with process mining (Process Intelligence) under one login. Almost nothing else on the market does both at the same depth. Most of the alternatives below only replace one half, and buying the wrong half is the single most expensive mistake a Signavio evaluation can make: a modelling-only team that signs an ARIS or Celonis enterprise contract is paying for mining depth it will never use, and a mining-focused team that buys a pure diagramming tool has solved nothing.

ARIS is the only alternative on this list that matches Signavio's own modelling-plus-mining combination directly, and it comes with a comparable enterprise price tag and a comparable refusal to publish one. If mining specifically is the piece you cannot lose, Celonis is the category-defining answer and Apromore is the honest budget answer, a genuinely free, open-source mining engine if your team can self-host it. If modelling and documentation are the whole job, Bizagi's free Modeler, IBM Blueworks Live, Microsoft Visio, and Lucidchart all do that piece for a fraction of Signavio's named-user pricing, and none of them will ever show you a mining dashboard.

1. Celonis: The Mining Platform Signavio's Process Intelligence Module Is Competing Against

Celonis is the category-defining name in process mining, the discipline of reconstructing how a process actually runs from system event logs rather than how a diagram says it should run. For a Signavio buyer whose real interest is the Process Intelligence module specifically, not the modelling half, Celonis is the most direct evaluation: it is a dedicated mining and execution management platform built around exactly that job, with deep connectors into SAP, Salesforce, ServiceNow, and other systems of record. Deloitte's 2025 Global Process Mining Survey found 48% of organizations now report company-wide process mining adoption, up from 45% in 2021, and 80% agreed the discipline delivers added value, the demand curve both Celonis and Signavio's own mining module are riding.

Celonis does not publish a dollar figure anywhere on its own pricing page, which is a contact form. It does offer the Celonis Free Plan (the successor to its earlier Snap offering), a genuinely free entry point capped at 1GB of uploaded data, enough to mine a real process on flat files or a handful of connectors before any budget conversation starts. Beyond that, pricing is quote-based and scales with data volume, process scope, and deployment type. Third-party spend-tracking data from SpendHound (based on 160 customer records, published March 2026 and last updated July 2026) puts average SMB pricing around $1,083 per year and average enterprise pricing around $418,048 per year, figures that should be read as a planning signal, not a quote.

Pricing: No public dollar figure; celonis.com/pricing is a contact form. Celonis Free Plan is free, capped at 1GB of data. Third-party data (SpendHound) reports average SMB pricing around $1,083/year and average enterprise pricing around $418,048/year (reported). (Celonis, Celonis Community, SpendHound) Best for: A team whose Signavio evaluation was really about the Process Intelligence module, and who wants the deepest mining-specific platform on the market without a modelling suite attached. Not ideal for: A team that also needs to model, document, and govern processes; Celonis expects a separate tool for that half of the job.

2. Bizagi: A Genuinely Free Modeler, an Execution Engine Behind It

Bizagi splits cleanly into two products, and it is the most direct answer for a Signavio buyer whose real need is the modelling half without the mining bill attached. Bizagi Modeler is free (Bizagi's own product page calls it "Bizagi's free process modeling software"), with intuitive BPMN 2.0 process mapping, publishing to PDF, Word, Excel, the web, and SharePoint, import from Visio and XPDL/BPMN files, and process simulation, all included at no cost and with no stated user cap.

The second product, Bizagi Platform, is the execution engine that actually runs the processes you model, priced on a consumption basis with "no limits on the number of users or apps within your subscription," per Bizagi's own pricing page. No dollar figure appears anywhere on that page either; getting a real number means requesting a quote or a pricing brochure. That combination, a genuinely free modelling layer next to an unpriced execution engine, mirrors Signavio's own modelling-plus-execution shape more closely than most tools on this list, just without the mining module. For the wider modelling-versus-execution question this comparison sits inside, see Best Business Process Management Software.

Pricing: Bizagi Modeler is free, no stated user or time cap. Bizagi Platform is consumption-based with unlimited users and apps per subscription; no dollar figure published, request a quote or pricing brochure. (Bizagi) Best for: A team wanting to model and document processes for free before committing budget to an execution engine, the closest thing to a no-risk first step off Signavio. Not ideal for: A team that needs process mining; Bizagi has no mining module to compare against Signavio's Process Intelligence.

3. ARIS (Software AG): The Closest Full Peer to Signavio's Own Scope

ARIS is the process-mining and enterprise-architecture platform built by SAG ARIS GmbH (formerly the ARIS business unit of Software AG), and it is the one alternative on this list that genuinely matches Signavio's combination of modelling, governance, and mining rather than replacing just one half. Like Signavio, ARIS sells into large SAP-adjacent enterprises running transformation programs, and its process-architecture depth (linking process, application, data, and organizational models together, not just drawing flowcharts) is built for the same buyer who evaluates Signavio's Collaboration Hub and Process Manager.

ARIS does not publish subscription pricing on its own site; access runs through a sales conversation, the same opacity Signavio has. A free "Process Mining Basic" trial exists for an initial process-discovery pass. Third-party analysis (ERP Research) reports sample deployments ranging from roughly $35,000 a year for a 15-user Viewer license up to over $150,000 a year for a full Modeler deployment, figures that should be treated as directional, not quoted.

Pricing: No public dollar figure; quote-based via sales. A free Process Mining Basic trial is available. Third-party estimates (ERP Research) report sample deployments from roughly $35,000/year (15-user Viewer) to over $150,000/year (full Modeler) (reported). (ARIS, ERP Research) Best for: Enterprise architecture teams running an SAP transformation program who need governance across process, application, and data architecture at the same depth Signavio itself sells. Not ideal for: A small team without an existing EA program; ARIS's reported total cost of ownership reaches six figures fast, the same problem you were likely trying to escape with Signavio.

4. Apromore: An Open-Source Mining Engine You Can Actually Run for Free

Apromore is the entry on this list that answers Signavio's pricing opacity with the opposite approach entirely: Apromore Core, the foundation of the product, is 100% free and open-source under the GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0, with its source code published on GitHub. It includes process discovery, process comparison, conformance checking, and a BPMN authoring environment, real mining and modelling functionality, not a crippled trial, that a technical team can self-host without ever starting a sales conversation.

Apromore Enterprise Edition (EE) is the commercially licensed, supported version built on top of Apromore Core, and it adds features like predictive process monitoring aimed at production deployments. Apromore's own EE licensing page confirms the split explicitly: EE runs under a commercial license while it still incorporates the LGPL-licensed Core underneath. No dollar figure is published for EE anywhere on Apromore's site; the company's own language describes "flexible pricing" for "a value-driven pathway," with an actual number reachable only through a sales conversation.

Pricing: Apromore Core is free and open-source (GNU LGPL v3.0). Apromore Enterprise Edition (EE) is commercially licensed, no dollar figure published, quote-based. (Apromore EE Licensing, Apromore Core on GitHub) Best for: A developer-capable team wanting to try genuine process mining, discovery, conformance checking, comparison, for free, before ever quoting Signavio, Celonis, or ARIS. Not ideal for: A team wanting a polished, support-backed SaaS product without engineering effort; that is the EE conversation, and it is no more transparent than Signavio's own.

5. IBM Blueworks Live: Cloud Process Mapping, No Mining Layer

IBM Blueworks Live is a cloud-based process-mapping and documentation tool, the half of Signavio's job that lives in Process Manager and Collaboration Hub, without any mining component at all. It is built for exactly the collaborative documentation work a business analyst or process owner does before (or instead of) buying an execution or mining platform: mapping a process, getting stakeholders to review and comment, and publishing a version everyone agrees on.

IBM's own product and pricing pages carry no dollar figures at all, only a free trial and a "Buy Now" path to sales; getting a real number means a direct conversation or a reseller quote. Third-party pricing aggregators (SoftwareSuggest) report a Basic plan around $56 per user per month, positioned "for Freelancers and Small Teams," a figure Blueworks Live itself does not confirm on its own site.

Pricing: No public dollar figure on IBM's own product or pricing pages; a free trial is available. Third-party reports (SoftwareSuggest) cite a Basic plan around $56/user/month (reported). (IBM Blueworks Live, SoftwareSuggest) Best for: A team wanting a pure cloud modelling and documentation tool, backed by an enterprise vendor, without paying for a mining module it will not use. Not ideal for: A team that specifically evaluated Signavio for its Process Intelligence mining capability; Blueworks Live has no equivalent.

6. Appian: Governed Execution, Not Modelling or Mining

Appian belongs on this list for the Signavio buyer whose real complaint was never the modelling or mining halves, it was that Signavio does not run the process once it is documented. Appian is a low-code execution platform built for governed, audited case management, the kind insurance, banking, and government teams need once a process has to actually move work through approval chains with a full audit trail. Gartner named Appian a Leader in its inaugural Magic Quadrant for Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (BOAT), published October 2025, the framework that replaced the older iBPMS category. For the fuller field in this exact category, Best Appian Alternatives covers the matchup on its own, and Appian vs Pega runs the direct comparison against the next entry on this list.

Appian sells Standard, Advanced, and Premium editions, each priced per user, per month, per app, not a flat per-seat rate, so two teams with identical headcounts can land on very different bills depending on how many separate applications they build. None of the three editions carries a public dollar figure; every quote runs through sales. A free Community Edition exists for personal development and learning, explicitly not licensed for production traffic.

Pricing: Standard, Advanced, and Premium editions, each priced per user per month per app, no dollar figure published. Community Edition free for personal development only, not production. (Appian) Best for: Regulated enterprises that need governed, audited case execution once a Signavio-documented process is ready to actually run. Not ideal for: A team that only needed to model or mine a process; Appian's per-app enterprise pricing is a much bigger commitment than that job requires.

7. Pega Platform: Case Management at Enterprise Scale, Pricing Behind a Wall

Pega's pitch is case management at enterprise scale: insurance claims, loan origination, government benefits processing, workflows where a single case moves through dozens of decision points over days or weeks and needs a complete audit trail at every step. Pega layers decisioning and next-best-action logic on top of that case engine, the same territory Appian competes in and a common next step for a Signavio buyer once the documented process needs to actually execute with that level of governance.

Pega's own pricing page prints no tiers, no dollar figures, and no billing basis; the only call to action is a free trial link and a path to sales. Third-party reports place typical deals anywhere from $100,000 to over $2 million a year depending on scale and scope (reported), a wide enough range that it functions as a planning signal rather than a quote. Pega and Appian land on most of the same shortlists and neither publishes a number, which makes the choice between them a capability question rather than a price one; Appian vs Pega runs that comparison directly.

Pricing: No public pricing published; free trial available; production licensing requires a custom sales quote. Third-party reports cite deals from roughly $100,000 to over $2 million a year depending on scope (reported). (Pega) Best for: Large enterprises running high-volume, multi-step case management that need decisioning built into the workflow itself, once modelling and mining are already handled elsewhere. Not ideal for: A team wanting a public price ladder to compare, or one still deciding between modelling and mining rather than ready to run a case-management engine.

8. Camunda: The Open-Source Engine for Running What Mining Reveals

Camunda takes the opposite approach from Signavio's low-code modelling canvas: it is a BPMN 2.0 process orchestration engine built for developers, with Zeebe as the execution core, meant to be embedded, versioned, and deployed through code once a process (documented in Signavio, ARIS, or Bizagi, and possibly mined in Celonis or Apromore) is ready to actually run inside real systems. For a Signavio customer whose next step is execution rather than more modelling or mining, Camunda is the honest next tool, not a like-for-like swap for any part of Signavio itself.

Self-Managed Development is free, runs locally, and is explicitly non-production, no license required. Self-Managed Production needs an Enterprise license, which requires a sales conversation. Camunda's SaaS offering gives a 30-day free trial with full execution; after that, the free tier drops to modelling only, with no runtime execution included. No dollar figure is published anywhere on Camunda's pricing page.

Pricing: Self-Managed Development free (local, non-production, no license). Self-Managed Production requires an Enterprise license, sales conversation. SaaS offers a 30-day free trial with full execution, then modelling-only. No dollar figure published. (Camunda) Best for: Developer-led teams that want to run what a Signavio modelling or mining project already documented, embedded into their own applications rather than a vendor's UI. Not ideal for: A business-user-led team that wanted Signavio's drag-and-drop modelling specifically; Camunda expects engineers, not process owners.

9. Microsoft Power Automate: Mining-Lite for Microsoft Shops

Power Automate is the execution layer of the Microsoft Power Platform, and for a Signavio evaluator who is already deep in Microsoft 365 and Dataverse, its Process Mining add-on is the cheapest realistic way to get a taste of mining depth without a Celonis- or ARIS-scale enterprise contract. Cloud flows and RPA bots handle automation, and Process Mining layers visibility into how a process actually runs, the same job Signavio's Process Intelligence module does, on top of infrastructure many enterprises already pay for.

Premium runs $15 per user per month paid yearly, a real published figure, separate from bot pricing: unattended bots run $150 per bot per month paid yearly, and hosted bots run $215 per bot per month paid yearly. Process Mining itself is a $5,000 per tenant per month add-on, paid yearly, available only alongside Premium, a real number, unlike anything Signavio, Celonis, or ARIS will show you before a call. A free trial is available.

Pricing: Premium $15/user/month paid yearly. Process (unattended bot) $150/bot/month paid yearly. Hosted Process $215/bot/month paid yearly. Process Mining add-on $5,000/tenant/month paid yearly, requires Premium. Free trial available. (Microsoft) Best for: Microsoft 365 shops wanting a mining-lite entry point layered onto automation they already pay for, instead of a dedicated mining vendor's enterprise contract. Not ideal for: A team needing Celonis- or ARIS-grade mining depth; Power Automate's mining feature is an add-on to an automation product, not a standalone platform.

10. Nintex: Workflow Plus Document Generation, Not Modelling or Mining

Nintex pairs workflow automation with document generation (its Drawloop lineage) and basic process mapping, a combination aimed at teams whose process output is a signed, generated document rather than a mined insight or a governed diagram. For a Signavio buyer whose actual complaint has nothing to do with modelling depth or mining, but with a process that ends in a contract, approval letter, or onboarding packet that nobody automated, Nintex is a genuinely different tool solving a genuinely different problem. The dedicated Best Nintex Alternatives guide covers the fourteen platforms that most often replace Nintex itself.

Its pricing page carries no tiers, no per-user rate, and no starting figure of any kind; the entire page directs visitors to a contact form. Third-party review site Cloudwards reports Nintex Workflow pricing around $910 a month for a Standard plan and $1,400 a month for an Advanced plan, both apparently allowing unlimited users and up to 100 business processes, figures Nintex itself does not confirm.

Pricing: No public pricing published; contact sales for a quote. Third-party review site Cloudwards reports Workflow Standard around $910/month and Advanced around $1,400/month (reported). (Nintex, Cloudwards) Best for: Teams whose real Signavio-adjacent need was workflow automation paired with document generation, not process modelling or mining. Not ideal for: Enterprise process intelligence or EA-grade modelling; Nintex does neither.

11. Kissflow: No-Code Process Building for Teams That Never Needed EA Depth

Kissflow built its reputation on no-code process and app building for business users, and it is a fair option for a Signavio buyer who, after evaluating the platform, realized their actual need was simpler than EA-grade governance or process mining ever required. What Kissflow shares with Signavio less flatteringly is pricing opacity: as of September 2026, kissflow.com/pricing sells a consultation-led, fixed annual agreement, with the page itself stating "Pricing built around the value you generate" and no tier or dollar figure. Older circulating figures (a widely repeated $1,500 a month number) no longer reflect what the vendor's own page shows and should be treated as stale.

For the closest matchup on this exact no-code process-builder question, Best Kissflow Alternatives runs the comparison directly, and Kissflow vs Pipefy covers the head-to-head against the next entry on this list.

Pricing: Not published on Kissflow's pricing page; sold as a fixed annual agreement quoted per organization. (Kissflow) Best for: Business teams that realize their Signavio evaluation was overkill and just need a no-code process and app builder. Not ideal for: A team that specifically needed Signavio's EA governance or Process Intelligence mining; Kissflow competes at neither depth.

12. Pipefy: The Free Tier for a Team That Was Overbuying With Signavio

Pipefy takes a kanban-first approach: each card represents a case or record moving through a process, aimed at operations teams wanting a visual, no-developer-required way to build a workflow-backed app. For a reader who got quoted Signavio's per-named-user pricing for what turned out to be a handful of straightforward processes, Pipefy's Starter tier is a genuinely usable free option: up to 5 processes, 10 users, 50 cards per month, and 500 database records, with no credit card required and 1,000 AI credits included every month.

Business moves to per-user billing with unlimited processes and users, but Pipefy does not publish a dollar figure for it; Enterprise is similarly unpriced. For a closer look at this specific matchup, Best Pipefy Alternatives covers it directly, and Kissflow vs Pipefy is the head-to-head against the previous entry.

Pricing: Starter free (5 processes, 10 users, 50 cards/month, 500 database records, 2GB storage). Business and Enterprise custom, contact sales. (Pipefy) Best for: Small ops teams whose Signavio evaluation was really overkill for a handful of processes better served by a free kanban-style builder. Not ideal for: A team needing BPMN-level modelling depth, EA governance, or any process mining capability.

13. Quickbase: A No-Code Database That Actually Publishes a Per-User Price

Quickbase approaches this category from the opposite direction of Signavio: it is a no-code relational database and app builder first, with workflow automations layered on top of the apps you build, rather than a dedicated process-modelling or mining suite. For a reader whose real need was closer to "build a tracked, structured app" than "govern an enterprise process architecture," Quickbase can be a far better-fit, far cheaper switch than anything else on this list. The dedicated Best Quickbase Alternatives guide covers this category from Quickbase's own side.

Quickbase is one of the few vendors on this whole list that prints a real per-user dollar figure: Team runs from $35 per user per month, priced annually, with a 30-day free trial. The catch, stated on Quickbase's own pricing page, is "Cost shown does not include platform minimum," a fee Quickbase never quantifies, plus the requirement that all users sit on the same plan.

Pricing: Team from $35/user/month, priced annually. Business and Enterprise custom. 30-day free trial. Platform minimum applies on top, unquantified. (Quickbase) Best for: A team whose Signavio-adjacent need was really a structured tracker with a few automated alerts, better served by a database-first tool than an EA-grade process suite. Not ideal for: Anyone needing BPMN modelling depth, process governance, or mining; Quickbase's automations sit inside its apps, not as a standalone process layer.

14. Microsoft Visio: The Cheapest Realistic Swap for Modelling Alone

Microsoft Visio is general-purpose diagramming, not a process-architecture suite, and it is the honest, cheap answer for a reader whose Signavio evaluation was purely about drawing and documenting a process, with no governance, execution, or mining requirement attached. Visio supports advanced process diagrams including BPMN 2.0 on its higher plan, the same open notation standard Signavio, Bizagi, and ARIS all use, which is what lets a diagram built in Visio import cleanly into a heavier tool later if the need grows.

Plan 1 runs $5 per user per month paid yearly, covering the web and Teams apps only, with no desktop application. Plan 2 runs $15 per user per month paid yearly and adds the full desktop app with offline support, BPMN 2.0 process diagrams, AutoCAD file support, and deeper Office integrations. Visio is also included at a lightweight, no-extra-charge level inside standard Microsoft 365 commercial plans.

Pricing: Plan 1 $5/user/month paid yearly (web and Teams apps, no desktop app). Plan 2 $15/user/month paid yearly (adds the desktop app, BPMN 2.0 diagrams, AutoCAD support). Included at a lightweight level in Microsoft 365 commercial plans. (Microsoft) Best for: A reader who only ever needed to draw and document a process, the cheapest realistic swap for Signavio's Process Manager modelling layer alone. Not ideal for: Anyone needing governance, execution, or mining; Visio only draws the picture.

15. Lucidchart: Collaborative Diagramming Outside the Microsoft Ecosystem

Lucidchart is the browser-based equivalent to Visio, real-time collaborative diagramming for teams that are not standardized on Microsoft 365, or that want a lighter, faster tool than a full EA suite for the modelling half of a Signavio replacement. Like Visio, it supports BPMN-style process diagrams and integrates with common workspace tools, making it a reasonable stand-in for Signavio's Collaboration Hub specifically, the review-and-comment layer, without any of the governance or mining depth behind it.

Lucidchart's Individual plan runs $9 a month plus tax, and a free tier exists but is capped at 3 editable documents, enough to trial the collaborative editing experience but not to run a real team's process library on. Team and Enterprise pricing scales from there and is best confirmed directly on Lucidchart's own current pricing page before budgeting.

Pricing: Individual $9/month plus tax. Free tier capped at 3 editable documents. Team and Enterprise pricing scales from there. (Lucidchart) Best for: Teams wanting real-time collaborative diagramming outside Microsoft, a lighter swap for Signavio's Collaboration Hub without any mining cost attached. Not ideal for: Anyone needing BPMN governance, EA depth, or process mining; Lucidchart, like Visio, only draws and documents.

Cost at 10, 25, and 100 Users

Built only from published rates; every vendor here that competes at Signavio's own altitude (mining, EA governance, enterprise case management) has no printed dollar figure at all, which is itself the finding worth noting.

The free rows above are not a trick, they are genuinely free development, modelling, or capped-mining tiers, not production-ready team deployments at scale. Once a team actually needs the mining or EA-governance depth Signavio itself sells, the table goes almost entirely blank, which is the honest reason so many Signavio evaluations end in a sales call instead of a spreadsheet.

Stage Fit: Where Each Tool Wins as You Scale

Sizing and Persona Fit

How to Choose: Decision Framework

Start with which half of Signavio's job you actually need, then use it to narrow the shortlist.

If what your team actually lost patience with is Signavio's own workflow-execution options rather than its modelling or mining halves, the wider category is covered in Best Business Process Management Software, and the closest direct alternative to a nearby SAP-adjacent modelling suite is covered in Best Bizagi Alternatives.

What to Do Next

Start by naming which half of Signavio's job you actually need: modelling and documentation, process mining, or both. If it's modelling alone, trial Bizagi's free Modeler or Microsoft Visio against your two or three most-documented processes before spending anything. If it's mining specifically, sign up for Celonis's Free Plan or self-host Apromore Core on a real dataset and see what it surfaces before a sales call. If you genuinely need both at Signavio's own depth, get a scoped quote from ARIS alongside your Signavio renewal quote and compare them line for line, since neither will show you a number until you ask.