Best Enterprise AI Visibility Platforms in 2026: 12 Vendors Checked Against a Procurement Review
Turn this article into takeaways for your work.
Each assistant summarizes the article only for you and suggests best practices for your work.
"Enterprise" in this category mostly means "we won't print the price." Of the 12 platforms below, only Ahrefs ($1,499 a month, annual commitment) and Trakkr (from $1,000 a month, billed annually) publish an Enterprise price that includes SSO. Rankscale prints a $780 top tier without SSO, HubSpot AEO is a $50 Beta product, and the other eight route you to a demo or sales call, several of them holding the strongest security paperwork in the group. So this guide doesn't fake a cost ranking. It sorts vendors by what a security and procurement review actually blocks on: SSO, a SOC 2 report, audit logs, contract terms, and whether the company will still exist in the form you bought.
The short version. Profound, Conductor, Scrunch, Goodie and AthenaHQ publish the fullest control sets, and four of them state a SOC 2 Type II report. Peec AI suits a GDPR-first buyer whose IT team accepts SAML 2.0 alone. Semrush, Ahrefs and HubSpot fit when AEO must sit inside a contract you already hold, though HubSpot's AEO product is still Beta, a stop sign for most procurement teams. We read each vendor's pricing, security, legal and docs pages on 5 October 2026. "Not stated" means we found nothing there, not that the control is missing.
This ranks software you run yourself. Paid placement is a different purchase, covered in our guide to AI citation placement services. Without the enterprise lens, see Best AEO Tools in 2026.
Key Facts
- Only 8% of Google visits in a Pew Research Center sample of 900 US adults ended in a click on a regular result when an AI summary appeared, against 15% when none did (Pew, March 2025 data).
- Only 12% of links cited by ChatGPT, Gemini and Copilot appeared in Google's top 10 for the same prompt, across 15,000 prompts (Ahrefs, August 2025; Ahrefs sells Brand Radar, an AI visibility product).
- Our count on 5 October 2026: 4 of the 12 vendors can be priced from public pages at a 500-prompt workload; 8 can't.
- Seven of 12 vendors state a SOC 2 report of their own (two claims cover a parent platform, not the AEO product). Three cite only their cloud host's certificates, one is in progress, and one states nothing.
- Three of the 12 sit in recent acquisitions: Adobe closed its Semrush purchase on 28 April 2026, Sitecore announced its Scrunch purchase on 3 June 2026, and HubSpot's AEO product came from its XFunnel deal, announced 31 October 2025.
- Profound says it raised a $180 million Series D at a $1.8 billion valuation on 15 September 2026 (Profound newsroom), a company statement.
Quick Comparison Table
| Vendor | Best for | Enterprise price | Key strength | Key limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profound | Brands wanting an agent plus audited controls | No base price | SOC 2 Type II, SAML/OIDC, SCIM | No paid self-serve brand tier |
| Conductor | SEO teams adding AEO to one contract | Not published | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 | SEO first, AEO second |
| Scrunch | Full control set plus site-delivery layer | Not published | SOC 2 Type II, audit logs | Sitecore-owned; SAML only on Enterprise |
| Goodie | SOC 2 plus SCIM plus content drafting | Not published | SAML, SCIM, Type I and II | No DPA or audit log found |
| AthenaHQ | Buyers who mark up contracts first | Not published | Public MSA and DPA, audit log | SOC II type not stated |
| Peec AI | GDPR-first teams, agencies | Not published | Unlimited users, SAML 2.0 | No SOC 2 statement |
| Semrush | Teams inside a Semrush contract | Custom | PCI DSS Level 1, SAML | Adobe-owned; SOC 2 on one page |
| Ahrefs | Teams wanting a printed price | $1,499/mo | Invoice, SAML, audit log, DPA | SOC 2 not yet certified |
| HubSpot AEO | Low-risk trial for HubSpot shops | $50/mo Beta | Parent holds SOC 2 Type 2 | Beta: as-is, no support duty |
| Otterly | Lean teams wanting posted prices | Custom | Custom terms, SAML | SOC 2 belongs to AWS |
| Rankscale | Budget buyers, wide coverage | $780/mo; SSO custom | No engine add-ons, though Claude costs 8x ChatGPT in credits | No security page |
| Trakkr | Mid-size teams wanting SSO | From $1,000/mo | Prices SSO and security review | No own SOC 2 |
What "Enterprise" Actually Buys
Read the tiers before the features. Four vendors print a top-tier number, but only Ahrefs and Trakkr attach SSO to it.
| Vendor | Entry paid tier | Top tier | Billing and commitment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Profound | Free 7-day trial | Custom | No base price; agency add-ons $399 and $199 |
| Conductor | Not published | Not published | Usage-based |
| Peec AI | $95/mo | Custom, annual | Monthly; 15% off annual |
| Scrunch | $250/mo (Core) | Custom | Enterprise annual: two months free |
| Goodie | $399/mo annual ($478.80 monthly) | Custom | Monthly, quarterly, annual |
| AthenaHQ | Free; Starter $295/mo | Custom credits | Order Forms auto-renew |
| Otterly | $29/mo (Lite) | Custom, 1,000+ prompts | Annual saves 15% |
| Rankscale | $20/mo ($17 yearly) | $780/mo; custom above | Monthly or yearly |
| Trakkr | $100/mo | From $1,000/mo | Enterprise annual |
| Semrush | $99/mo per domain | Custom | Base billed annually per pricing page; knowledge base says monthly |
| Ahrefs | Brand Radar from $50/mo | $1,499/mo | Annual commitment |
| HubSpot AEO | $50/mo ($45 annual) | In Marketing Hub Pro and Enterprise | Beta |
Three cautions. Goodie's $399 is the annual-billing rate. Profound shows no base fee, only agency add-ons: a client workspace at $399 a month and five trial workspaces at $199. On Scrunch's rendered brands tab, loaded from Vietnam, we saw Core at $250 a month plus Enterprise, while a US-routed fetch returns the Starter $300 and Growth $500 tiers that older roundups quote. Both layouts are real vendor pages, so check what your own region sees. We didn't price its agency tab. Ahrefs also serves currency by region: USD on its pricing page, GBP on its Brand Radar page.
The Procurement Matrix
A security review asks three families of question. Identity first. Most vendors list role-based access, so it doesn't separate them; SSO, SCIM and the audit log do.
| Vendor | SSO | SCIM | Customer audit log |
|---|---|---|---|
| Profound | SAML or OIDC, Enterprise | Yes (21 Aug 2026) | Yes, Enterprise (7 Aug 2026) |
| Conductor | SAML | Not stated | Not stated |
| Peec AI | SAML 2.0 only; Peec sets it up | No | Not stated |
| Scrunch | SAML, OIDC; Enterprise | Not stated | Yes |
| Goodie | SAML | Yes | Not stated |
| AthenaHQ | SAML, OIDC; Enterprise | Not stated | Yes |
| Otterly | SAML via Clerk; Enterprise | Not stated | Not stated |
| Rankscale | Custom plan only | Not stated | Not stated |
| Trakkr | Enterprise | Not stated | Not stated |
| Semrush | SAML; Guru, Business plans | Not stated | Not stated |
| Ahrefs | SAML 2.0; Enterprise | Via support | Yes, Enterprise |
| HubSpot AEO | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
Attestations and data location come second. A vendor citing its host's certificate is telling the truth and answering a different question.
| Vendor | Own SOC 2 | Other attestations, DPA | Hosting stated |
|---|---|---|---|
| Profound | Type II | HIPAA assessment; GDPR-Ready wording | Not stated |
| Conductor | Type II | ISO 27001, ISO 42001, annual pen test, DPA terms | Region not stated |
| Peec AI | Not stated | GDPR policy; processor agreements | Google Cloud via Google Ireland |
| Scrunch | Type II | GDPR, CCPA; Trust Center | Not stated |
| Goodie | Type I and II | No DPA found | Not stated |
| AthenaHQ | "SOC II," type not stated | Public DPA, EU clauses | Not stated |
| Otterly | AWS's, not its own | DPA document | AWS Frankfurt; public monitoring data in the US |
| Rankscale | Google Cloud's, not its own | EU clauses for processors | Google Cloud, Iowa |
| Trakkr | Hosts' only; own under evaluation | GDPR handling, 72-hour breach notice | Supabase on Google Cloud |
| Semrush | Enterprise page only | PCI DSS Level 1, pen tests, DPAs | AWS, Google Cloud, colocation |
| Ahrefs | Not yet certified | Public DPA; 2024 pen test summary | AWS |
| HubSpot | Platform Type 2, SOC 3 | Trust Center; pen test summaries | US East; Frankfurt option |
Commercial terms come third, and they're where small vendors are most uneven.
| Vendor | Term and renewal | Invoice or PO |
|---|---|---|
| Profound | Not stated | Not stated |
| Conductor | Not stated | Not stated |
| Peec AI | Enterprise annual; 30 days' notice | Invoice, transfer or card; 14 days |
| Scrunch | Annual upfront discount | Not stated |
| Goodie | Monthly to annual | Not stated |
| AthenaHQ | Auto-renews; no termination for convenience | Invoice, net 30, in advance |
| Otterly | Custom terms, Enterprise | Custom payment options |
| Rankscale | 12-month: 30 days' notice | Card via Stripe; 14 days |
| Trakkr | Annual; custom contracts | Not stated |
| Semrush | Base billed annually per pricing page; knowledge base says monthly | Not stated |
| Ahrefs | Enterprise annual commitment | Invoice and wire, Enterprise only |
| HubSpot AEO | Beta, terminable any time | Self-serve checkout |
AthenaHQ's MSA holds the only availability figure we found (99.9% a month). Profound lists a 24-hour support SLA; Scrunch, Rankscale and Trakkr mention SLAs without numbers.
Enterprise-Ready or a Point Tool With an Enterprise Button
That's the real split, and it isn't big versus small. A nimble vendor can still be right: AthenaHQ publishes a contract most larger vendors keep behind a sales call, and Trakkr says plainly that its SOC 2 coverage is its providers'.
| Group | Vendors | What the evidence shows |
|---|---|---|
| Own SOC 2, full control set | Profound, Conductor, Scrunch, Goodie, AthenaHQ | SOC 2, SAML SSO and an access or audit layer on their own pages |
| Real machinery, one gap | Semrush, Ahrefs | Security page, DPA, SAML, pen tests; SOC 2 on one page (Semrush) or not yet earned (Ahrefs) |
| Strong paper, no SOC 2 statement | Peec AI | GDPR-first policy, SAML 2.0, unlimited seats |
| Inherited certificates only | Otterly, Rankscale, Trakkr | Cite AWS, Google Cloud or Supabase |
| Strong parent, immature product | HubSpot AEO | Platform SOC 2 Type 2; product in Beta |
Ask for the report itself, with its audit period and a scope naming the product you're buying. A homepage claim is a starting point, not evidence.
The Five Built for Enterprise Procurement
1. Profound: audited controls, an agent product, no base price
Profound's Enterprise tier is demo-gated and no base fee is printed, though its agency view does show client workspaces at $399 a month. The controls are documented: SAML or OIDC SSO, SCIM and activity logs (see its changelog), a SOC 2 Type II report and a HIPAA assessment. It now positions as an "AI Marketer" agent, so score it as one. Right for large brands wanting audited controls plus agent workflows; wrong if you need a number before a call. See Profound alternatives.
2. Conductor: an SEO platform with AEO added, and the widest attestation list
Conductor's security center lists SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 42001, SAML SSO and annual third-party pen tests. Its pricing page shows three tiers, no dollar figure, and usage-based metering in AI Search Credits. Right for an enterprise SEO team wanting AEO inside one contract; wrong for a team shopping AEO alone. See Conductor alternatives.
3. Scrunch: SOC 2, SAML and OIDC, and a new owner
Sitecore announced its acquisition of Scrunch on 3 June 2026 and didn't disclose terms; Bloomberg reported about $225M. Scrunch's security FAQ states SOC 2 Type II, four user roles, audit logs and SLA guarantees without a figure; its enterprise page names Lenovo, Skims and Crunchbase, a vendor claim. SAML and OIDC are Enterprise-only. Right for buyers wanting a full control set plus site-delivery tooling who can live inside Sitecore's orbit; wrong where you need an independent vendor. See Scrunch alternatives.
4. Goodie: SOC 2 Type I and II with SCIM
Goodie's security page states SOC 2 Type I and Type II, SAML SSO, SCIM, role-based access and a Trust Center. Enterprise adds up to 13 models, 500-plus prompts and API access. GDPR wording, a DPA, data region and a customer audit log aren't stated. Right for teams wanting SOC 2 plus content drafting; wrong where residency must be in writing.
5. AthenaHQ: the contract is public
AthenaHQ's master subscription agreement and DPA are online. Order Forms auto-renew unless you give 30 days' notice and can't be ended for convenience; availability is 99.9% a month, with a 5% credit per hour-long outage as the sole remedy; either party may assign the contract in an acquisition. Enterprise adds SAML, OIDC and an organization log, and the footer lists SOC II and GDPR. Right for buyers who want to mark up a real contract; wrong if you need a Type II report today. See AthenaHQ alternatives.
The Three Suites With AEO Inside
6. Semrush: real machinery, new owner
Adobe completed its acquisition of Semrush on 28 April 2026, and Semrush continues as an Adobe company. Semrush's security page lists PCI DSS Level 1, annual pen tests, SIEM logging and data processing addenda. SAML SSO covers Guru and Business plans. SOC 2 Type II appears only on its Enterprise site, and whether it covers the $99 AI Visibility Toolkit isn't stated. Semrush's own pages also disagree on the toolkit's commercial terms: the pricing page says $99 billed annually with a seven-day trial, while the knowledge base says $99 a month and no trial, and extra seats are "from $45" on one page and a $99 license on the other. Get all three in writing. Right for teams already inside a Semrush contract; wrong for those wanting a standalone vendor. See Semrush toolkit alternatives.
7. Ahrefs: the printed price and the honest gap
Ahrefs prints its Enterprise price: $1,499 a month, annual commitment, with SSO, an audit log and uncapped API. Its FAQ says SAML and invoice payment are Enterprise-only, SCIM comes through support, a DPA with EU clauses is public, and SOC 2 is in progress with no report to share. The Enterprise page also shows an "ISO27001 certified" tile that the FAQ doesn't repeat and we couldn't match to a certificate. Right where you want a number and a DPA today; wrong where SOC 2 is a hard gate.
8. HubSpot AEO: strong parent, Beta product
HubSpot's platform holds a SOC 2 Type 2 report, a public SOC 3 and a Frankfurt data center option (security page). The AEO product is Beta at $50 a month ($45 annual) for 25 prompts on three engines, and its Beta terms say it's provided as-is, support isn't owed, and access can be suspended any time without liability. Right as a low-risk trial or for Marketing Hub Pro and Enterprise customers; wrong as a system of record until it exits Beta.
The Four Lean Tools With an Enterprise Tier
9. Peec AI: GDPR-first, SAML only
Peec AI is a Berlin GmbH; its privacy policy says it has signed processing agreements with each processor. Enterprise adds SSO, but its docs say SAML 2.0 only, no OIDC, no SCIM, set up by its team. We found no SOC 2 statement. Right for GDPR-led buyers and agencies; wrong where OIDC, SCIM or SOC 2 are gates. See Peec AI alternatives.
10. Otterly: transparent tiers, borrowed certificates
Otterly's security page lists SOC 1, SOC 2 and ISO 27001 as certifications of the AWS data centers it runs on. It hosts in Frankfurt, keeps public monitoring data in the US, and offers SAML through Clerk on Enterprise. Right for lean teams wanting prices on the page; wrong where the reviewer needs the vendor's own SOC 2.
11. Rankscale: wide coverage, thin enterprise paper
Rankscale prints a $780 tier with 12,000 credits and a REST API, but SSO sits on a custom plan alongside SLA guarantees, and its /security path returns a 404. Its privacy policy says it's hosted on Google Cloud in Iowa and cites Google's certifications, not its own. Right for budget buyers and agencies; wrong for a formal procurement review.
12. Trakkr: the candid one
Trakkr's Enterprise tier starts at $1,000 a month, billed annually, with SSO, a security review, custom contracts and a priority support SLA. Its security page says it inherits its providers' SOC 2 controls and is still evaluating its own certification. Right for a mid-size team needing SSO that will accept a questionnaire in place of a report; wrong for a Type II requirement.
What Enterprise Volume Really Costs
Metering is where rankings flip. Divide each published price by the answers it buys and the spread is about twenty to one.
| Plan | Monthly price | Answers a month | Price per answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trakkr Scale | $500 | 120,000 data points | $0.0042 |
| Trakkr Growth | $100 | 12,000 | $0.0083 |
| Ahrefs custom prompts, Scale | $250 | 25,000 checks | $0.0100 |
| Peec AI Advanced | $495 | 31,500 | $0.0157 |
| Otterly Standard | $189 | 12,000 (100 prompts, 4 engines, daily) | $0.0158 |
| Rankscale Enterprise | $780 | 48,000 | $0.0163 |
| Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit | $99 | 3,000 (25 prompts, 4 engines, daily) | $0.0330 |
| Scrunch Core | $250 | 5,000 responses | $0.0500 |
| AthenaHQ Starter | $295 | 3,600 (1 credit is 1 response) | $0.0819 |
Per-answer figures are derived from published limits; Otterly and Semrush counts assume daily runs.
Profound's agency tab prints a $399 client workspace with 100 daily prompts on three engines, about $0.044 an answer by our arithmetic. Conductor, Goodie and HubSpot can't be computed because they don't state answer volumes against price. This isn't a quality ranking: a $0.08 answer from a vendor with audited controls is a different product from a $0.004 data point. It's a prompt to ask what a credit, prompt or check is, and what overage costs.
Now a workload an enterprise might run: one brand, 500 prompts, 4 engines, daily (60,000 answers a month).
| Vendor | Priced from public pages? | Monthly cost |
|---|---|---|
| Ahrefs | Yes | $600 ($250 Scale package plus 35,000 extra checks at $0.010; Claude counts 8 checks per update) |
| Otterly | Yes | $588 (Premium $489 plus one 100-prompt pack at $99, monthly billing) |
| Semrush | Yes | $699 ($99 plus ten 50-prompt blocks at $60, from its knowledge base) |
| Trakkr | Floor only | From $1,000 (Enterprise, billed annually) |
| Rankscale | No | Needs about 15,000 credits; top tier holds 12,000 ($780) |
| Peec AI | No | Advanced stops at 350 prompts (a fourth model is a $165 monthly add-on); Enterprise custom |
| AthenaHQ | No | Needs 60,000 credits; Starter holds 3,600; Enterprise negotiated |
| Scrunch | No | Core stops at 125 prompts; Enterprise custom |
| Goodie | No | Pro stops at 250 prompts; Enterprise custom |
| Profound | No | No base fee shown; agency tab prints $399 per 100-prompt client workspace |
| Conductor | No | Not published |
| HubSpot AEO | No | 25 prompts included; extra-prompt rate not shown |
Build or Buy: When a Warehouse and a Cron Job Wins
At these volumes, scheduling prompts against provider APIs and writing answers to your own warehouse is a real option. Here's the search-tool fee floor for 500 prompts on three engines: 45,000 answers a month, 15,000 each.
| Provider | Search-tool fee | Fee at 15,000 answers a month |
|---|---|---|
| OpenAI web search tool | $10.00 per 1,000 calls, plus tokens | $150.00 |
| Gemini grounding with Google Search | $14 per 1,000 requests after 5,000 free a month | $140.00 |
| Perplexity web_search tool | $2.50 per 1,000 invocations, plus tokens | $37.50 |
| Total | $327.50, before model tokens |
Provider rates read on each provider's own pricing page on 5 October 2026. They change often, so confirm before you budget.
That floor sits below most vendor bills. It leaves out model tokens, storage, citation parsing, a dashboard, and the engineer who fixes it when a provider changes a tool.
| A build gives you | A build doesn't give you | |
|---|---|---|
| Data | Raw answers and history in your warehouse | Vendor benchmarks or prompt-volume data |
| Surfaces | Whatever the APIs expose | AI Overviews and AI Mode, which vendors track as separate engines |
| Fidelity | Repeatable, controlled queries | A guaranteed match to what a buyer sees in the interface |
| Access control | Your own IAM and BI governance | Vendor SSO, audit logs and a trust center for your reviewer |
Two catches. Peec AI's docs argue API answers often differ from what users see in the interface, which is why it collects through browser automation; Peec sells that data, so weigh it as a vendor argument. The reverse route has its own issue: OpenAI's consumer Terms of Use prohibit automatically or programmatically extracting output, so any vendor collecting through an interface carries a terms question. We don't know how any vendor resolves it, so ask. For the wider decision, see build vs buy vs integrate for AI tooling.
Build when you have a data team, a modest prompt list and a reason to own the raw answers. Buy when you need AI Overviews coverage, an executive-ready report, or something your security team can approve in a week.
Vendor Viability: What Changed in 12 Months
Enterprise contracts run for years. This category rearranged itself in months.
| Date | Event | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-31 | HubSpot announces XFunnel acquisition, terms undisclosed | HubSpot |
| 2025-11-19 | Adobe announces Semrush deal at $12 a share | Adobe |
| 2026-04-28 | Adobe completes the Semrush acquisition | Adobe |
| 2026-06-03 | Sitecore announces it acquired Scrunch | CMSWire |
| 2026-06-17 | Adobe launches Brand Visibility, combining LLM Optimizer with Semrush | Adobe |
| 2026-09-15 | Profound announces a $180M Series D | Profound |
Dates and terms as published by the companies named.
Semrush's customer FAQ says there will be no immediate changes to agreements and customers can keep both contracts for now. "Immediate" and "for now" are the words to negotiate around. Scrunch's pricing page shows different layouts depending on where it loads, and we can't tell whether that's region or an A/B test. Profound's round lowers its runway risk. For Conductor, Goodie, Otterly, Rankscale, Trakkr and AthenaHQ we found no ownership or funding statement on the pages we read, so put that in the RFP.
| Clause | Why it matters | What the evidence shows |
|---|---|---|
| Termination on change of control | An acquirer may change roadmap or price | AthenaHQ's MSA allows assignment in an acquisition and bars termination for convenience |
| Renewal notice and cap | Auto-renewal locks you in | AthenaHQ renews unless you give 30 days' notice; Ahrefs and Peec Enterprise are annual |
| Metering definitions | Units get redefined | One AthenaHQ credit is one response; Ahrefs counts a Claude update as 8 checks |
| Export and deletion on exit | Your history is the asset | Profound's trial lacks data exports; Enterprise lists CSV and JSON |
Evaluation Checklist and RFP Questions
Score each shortlisted vendor from 0 to 5 on these weights. Our SaaS vendor evaluation scorecard covers the general method.
| Criterion | Weight | Evidence to request |
|---|---|---|
| Access control (SSO, SCIM, audit log) | 20% | Config doc and the plan it needs |
| Attestations | 20% | SOC 2 Type II report with period and product scope |
| Price at your workload | 20% | Written quote with overage rates |
| Coverage and data fidelity | 15% | Engines, surfaces, collection method |
| Continuity | 15% | Ownership, funding, exit terms |
| Data location and DPA | 10% | Signed DPA, subprocessor list, region |
Then put these to every vendor in writing. How to run a SaaS RFP covers the process.
| Area | Ask | Red flag |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | Send the latest Type II report, period and scope | "In progress," or a host's certificate offered as theirs |
| SSO | Which protocols, on which plan, who configures, is SCIM available? | SSO only on a contract you haven't priced |
| Audit logs | Can admins export logins, role changes and API key events? | No log, or "ask support" |
| Data | Where is it stored, who are the subprocessors, whose DPA? | Region unstated; no subprocessor list |
| Collection | How are answers collected, and what's your position on provider terms? | Refusal to say |
| Metering | What does one credit, prompt or check cost past the plan? | Credit price "negotiated" with no floor |
| Change of control | Do we get a termination right and a price lock? | Silence |
How to Choose: Decision Framework
| If you need... | Shortlist |
|---|---|
| A SOC 2 Type II report, SAML or OIDC, and SCIM | Profound, Goodie; Scrunch if SCIM isn't a gate |
| A contract you can read before a demo | AthenaHQ, then Peec AI's published terms |
| A printed Enterprise number | Ahrefs, Trakkr |
| AEO inside an existing SEO contract | Semrush, Ahrefs, Conductor |
| A GDPR-first European vendor | Peec AI (Berlin), Rankscale (Austrian law in its terms) |
| The lowest price per answer | Trakkr, Ahrefs custom prompts |
| Healthcare or pharma | Profound (HIPAA assessment) |
Frequently Asked Questions about Enterprise AI Visibility Platforms
Which AI visibility platform is best for enterprise?
It depends on what your security review blocks on. Profound, Conductor, Scrunch, Goodie and AthenaHQ publish the fullest control sets, Ahrefs and Trakkr print an Enterprise price, and Peec AI is the GDPR-first option.
Do these platforms have SOC 2 reports?
Seven of the 12 state one of their own, though the Semrush and HubSpot claims cover a parent platform. Otterly, Rankscale and Trakkr cite their cloud hosts' certificates, Ahrefs says its SOC 2 is in progress, and Peec AI states nothing. Ask for the report itself.
Is HubSpot's AEO product ready for enterprise procurement?
Not yet. The product is Beta, and HubSpot's Beta terms say it's provided as-is, that support isn't owed, and that access can be suspended any time without liability. The parent platform's SOC 2 Type 2 doesn't change that.
Should we build our own tracker instead of buying?
At 500 prompts on three engines, search-tool fees alone come to about $328 a month before tokens, below most vendor bills. But you'd skip AI Overviews, build the parsing and dashboards, and own the maintenance. It suits teams with a data function.
What happens to my contract if the vendor is acquired?
Usually it follows the vendor. AthenaHQ's public agreement lets either side assign it in an acquisition without consent, and Semrush told customers to expect no immediate changes after Adobe's purchase. Negotiate a termination right and a price lock first.
What to Do Next
Pick three vendors from the decision table, send each the seven RFP questions in writing, and ask for the SOC 2 report and a quote at your real prompt and engine count. Then run a 30-day pilot on your own buyer questions, not the vendor's demo set. How to measure AI visibility explains why two tools can disagree about the same brand and what a defensible report looks like. If a vendor's pitch is an agent that changes your site rather than a dashboard, Best GEO Tools in 2026 shows which of these same vendors act on what they find, and the evidence on llms.txt and schema markup suggests the popular on-page tactics don't lift citations on their own.

On this page
- Key Facts
- Quick Comparison Table
- What "Enterprise" Actually Buys
- The Procurement Matrix
- Enterprise-Ready or a Point Tool With an Enterprise Button
- The Five Built for Enterprise Procurement
- 1. Profound: audited controls, an agent product, no base price
- 2. Conductor: an SEO platform with AEO added, and the widest attestation list
- 3. Scrunch: SOC 2, SAML and OIDC, and a new owner
- 4. Goodie: SOC 2 Type I and II with SCIM
- 5. AthenaHQ: the contract is public
- The Three Suites With AEO Inside
- 6. Semrush: real machinery, new owner
- 7. Ahrefs: the printed price and the honest gap
- 8. HubSpot AEO: strong parent, Beta product
- The Four Lean Tools With an Enterprise Tier
- 9. Peec AI: GDPR-first, SAML only
- 10. Otterly: transparent tiers, borrowed certificates
- 11. Rankscale: wide coverage, thin enterprise paper
- 12. Trakkr: the candid one
- What Enterprise Volume Really Costs
- Build or Buy: When a Warehouse and a Cron Job Wins
- Vendor Viability: What Changed in 12 Months
- Evaluation Checklist and RFP Questions
- How to Choose: Decision Framework
- What to Do Next